Thread View: alt.games.quake
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by be... Brandon Suzuki
Wed, 04 Jan 1995 08:27
BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: be... Brandon Suzuki
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 1995 08:27
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 1995 08:27
11 lines
1314 bytes
1314 bytes
okm I stated in my previous article that I had and AWE32 well I kinda jumped the gun on that one. I am planning to purchae a new sound card this week but i am a little unsure of which to get. The three options I have given myself are as follows: Soundblaster AWE32, ROLAND soundcanvas, or the new card by TURTLE BEACH. My main worry is supportability with future games (ie: QUAKE). I have already ordered an AWE32 at Compucentre. I just want to be sure that if I buy it I will have made the right choice. I would really appreciate some input on this one. Would the AWE 32 be able to digitally compress speech for the proposed chat mode on QUAKE??? Oh well hope to hear from you all soon! Bye for now! AKIRA!
Re: BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: umba... Brian Bagnall
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 1995 19:28
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 1995 19:28
3 lines
1035 bytes
1035 bytes
I heard there was no better sound card than Gravis Ultra Sound. I don't have it, unfortunately, so I can't back this up. Supposedly gives awesome 3-d sound.
Re: BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: ch... chris dale
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 1995 01:43
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 1995 01:43
10 lines
1016 bytes
1016 bytes
Brandon Suzuki (be...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote: : the new card by TURTLE BEACH. My main worry is supportability with future : games (ie: QUAKE). I have already ordered an AWE32 at Compucentre. I just Actually, one of the id guys said that Quake will only support true 3D sound on one card, which I believe is still being developed. chris ch...@winternet.com irc: ratbert
Re: BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: st... donald TAKESHI mcfall
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 1995 23:53
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 1995 23:53
35 lines
2068 bytes
2068 bytes
In article <D1yIn...@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>, wzh...@novice.uwaterloo.ca (Wayne) writes... >In article <D1x32...@freenet.carleton.ca>, >Andrew Smith <am...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: >> >>In a previous posting, chris dale (ch...@winternet.com) writes: >>> Brandon Suzuki (be...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote: >>BTW, the GUS cards can do true 3D sound using Tech from Forte >>the makers of the VR helmet HMD VFX-1 >> >>Gravis Ultrasound MAX at least ... not sure if the old GUS has it. >> >> >> >>True 3D ... NOT QSound(SB) or Hughes SRS(Vivid/MediaVision) >> which are only Stereo Field Enhancers. >> >> >>Bye! >> >> >> >Perhaps you would like to explain "true" 3D with 2 speakers ? There is no >such thing. True 3D is only accomplished with Surround Sound, something whci is >NOT supported by the GUS. What the GUS does use us binormial Sound Enhancement. >I'm not too sure what it is, but I read it in the GUS SDK. This is also >a 2D stereo enhancement. To be honest, I don't know how well the GUS 3D effects >stack up but SRS has been around for a LONG time (5-10 years?) and has been >proven technology. Qsound has also been here for awhile but I haven't been >convinced by Qsound Well, the GUS may not have an on-board surround decoder, but it certainly can support surround sound... Hell, anything capable of stereo can. -Donald McFall st...@jetson.uh.edu
Re: BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: wzh... Wayne
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 1995 23:59
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 1995 23:59
40 lines
2193 bytes
2193 bytes
In article <D1x32...@freenet.carleton.ca>, Andrew Smith <am...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: > >In a previous posting, chris dale (ch...@winternet.com) writes: >> Brandon Suzuki (be...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote: >> : the new card by TURTLE BEACH. My main worry is supportability with future >> : games (ie: QUAKE). I have already ordered an AWE32 at Compucentre. I just >> >> Actually, one of the id guys said that Quake will only support true >> 3D sound on one card, which I believe is still being developed. >> >> chris >> ch...@winternet.com >> irc: ratbert >> > > >BTW, the GUS cards can do true 3D sound using Tech from Forte >the makers of the VR helmet HMD VFX-1 > >Gravis Ultrasound MAX at least ... not sure if the old GUS has it. > > > >True 3D ... NOT QSound(SB) or Hughes SRS(Vivid/MediaVision) > which are only Stereo Field Enhancers. > > >Bye! > > > Perhaps you would like to explain "true" 3D with 2 speakers ? There is no such thing. True 3D is only accomplished with Surround Sound, something whci is NOT supported by the GUS. What the GUS does use us binormial Sound Enhancement. I'm not too sure what it is, but I read it in the GUS SDK. This is also a 2D stereo enhancement. To be honest, I don't know how well the GUS 3D effects stack up but SRS has been around for a LONG time (5-10 years?) and has been proven technology. Qsound has also been here for awhile but I haven't been convinced by Qsound
Re: BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: v... Vladimir Elberg
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 1995 15:21
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 1995 15:21
24 lines
1969 bytes
1969 bytes
Brandon Suzuki (be...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote: : okm I stated in my previous article that I had and AWE32 well I kinda : jumped the gun on that one. I am planning to purchae a new sound card this : week but i am a little unsure of which to get. The three options I have : given myself are as follows: Soundblaster AWE32, ROLAND soundcanvas, or : the new card by TURTLE BEACH. My main worry is supportability with future : games (ie: QUAKE). I have already ordered an AWE32 at Compucentre. I just : want to be sure that if I buy it I will have made the right choice. I : would really appreciate some input on this one. Would the AWE 32 be able : to digitally compress speech for the proposed chat mode on QUAKE??? : Oh well hope to hear from you all soon! Bye for now! : AKIRA! Its too early to tell what quake with get with 3d Sound and such, but I would not worry about the Awe-32 at all. The President of ID Software has an AWE-32 on his computer (Jay Wilbur). The Awe-32 also has the ability for speech built in with the ASP and such and then it has Sound Blaster and Sound Blaster 16 abilities. I have one, definatly worth it...... Roland is good for MUSIC ONLY, but the AWE-32 is good for DIGITAL and MUSIC. The Awe is definatly ONE of the best buys I have ever made (next to this 14.4kbps modem)
Re: BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: am... Andrew Smith
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 1995 16:06
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 1995 16:06
67 lines
3293 bytes
3293 bytes
In a previous posting, donald TAKESHI mcfall (st...@rosie.uh.edu) writes:
> In article <D1yIn...@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>, wzh...@novice.uwaterloo.ca (Wayne) writes...
>>In article <D1x32...@freenet.carleton.ca>,
>>Andrew Smith <am...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote:
>>>
>>>In a previous posting, chris dale (ch...@winternet.com) writes:
>>>> Brandon Suzuki (be...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
>>>BTW, the GUS cards can do true 3D sound using Tech from Forte
>>>the makers of the VR helmet HMD VFX-1
>>>
>>>Gravis Ultrasound MAX at least ... not sure if the old GUS has it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>True 3D ... NOT QSound(SB) or Hughes SRS(Vivid/MediaVision)
>>> which are only Stereo Field Enhancers.
>>>
>>>
>>>Bye!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Perhaps you would like to explain "true" 3D with 2 speakers ? There is no
>>such thing. True 3D is only accomplished with Surround Sound, something whci is
>>NOT supported by the GUS. What the GUS does use us binormial Sound Enhancement.
>>I'm not too sure what it is, but I read it in the GUS SDK. This is also
>>a 2D stereo enhancement. To be honest, I don't know how well the GUS 3D effects
>>stack up but SRS has been around for a LONG time (5-10 years?) and has been
>>proven technology. Qsound has also been here for awhile but I haven't been
>>convinced by Qsound
>
> Well, the GUS may not have an on-board surround decoder, but it certainly can
> support surround sound... Hell, anything capable of stereo can.
>
> -Donald McFall
> st...@jetson.uh.edu
WELL you are not understanding..
The Forte tech, as I understand it... is only for headphones.
And the idea is that if you turn you head...
Then the sound rotates around you. You perceive the sound
to rotate about your ears.. (I.E. From left to right and back.)
It can place a sound in the sound field so that you can detect which
direction it is coming from.
Now the SRS is good. and works AND you don't need a "sweet spot"(center)
like QSound.
Vivid uses SRS and it is better than QSOUND IMHO.
But the Forte thing with the GUS is for localizing sounds in the sound
field. For real VR effect. Only with Headphones.
That is what the binaural(not binomial) sound means.
bin (two) aural ("sound sources")
Thank you.
=)
Bye!
Andrew
--
|Andrew R. D. Smith - Carleton University Computer Science
|am...@freenet.carleton.ca + Psychology
Re: BEST SOUND CARD?!!]
Author: har... Michael Harris
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 18:43
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 18:43
16 lines
2020 bytes
2020 bytes
In article <D1vGu...@freenet.carleton.ca> be...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Brandon Suzuki) writes: > okm I stated in my previous article that I had and AWE32 well I kinda >jumped the gun on that one. I am planning to purchae a new sound card this >week but i am a little unsure of which to get. The three options I have >given myself are as follows: Soundblaster AWE32, ROLAND soundcanvas, or >the new card by TURTLE BEACH. My main worry is supportability with future >games (ie: QUAKE). I have already ordered an AWE32 at Compucentre. I just >want to be sure that if I buy it I will have made the right choice. I >would really appreciate some input on this one. Would the AWE 32 be able >to digitally compress speech for the proposed chat mode on QUAKE??? >Oh well hope to hear from you all soon! Bye for now! >AKIRA! As far as sound cards go, I've heard the turtle beach and was not particularly impressed. I bought the AWE32 when it first came out, and again, was not particularly impressed with the wavetable sounds. I returned the card after about 2 days and bought the SB16 basic and a Roland SCC-1. IMHO, nothing can beat this setup for games. Another alternative, although I haven't heard it, is Rolands daughterboard (DB-15 or something like that?). The SB16/SCC-1 setup, though, offers the best sound, music, and co mpatibility for practicly anything a game player will .
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads