Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #901Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C
From: ez01... Paul Lung
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 00:00
28 lines
1911 bytes
1911 bytes
Nathan Palovcik (am...@elycion.geology.ualberta.ca) wrote:
: I will give C&C high marks for it's humour, the music & SFX, IMHO better than
: Warcraft. 'Daboo!' just can't measure up against blood-curdling death
: screams. ;>
I find C&C a much better game design because there are different tactics
if you play different sides. For WCII, we have the exact same units on
both sides, so there really is no difference which side you play.
--
Paul Lung
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
___##_____________________________________________o__
/ / / / / / / / | | \
@^\/ / / / / / / (=====|________/_________________________|
\/__/_/_/_/_/_/_/________________________________________/|
/ -O (O) | ===================== |
\____ I-------------------------------------
I I (( II
I I (( II
I I[]=============
I I
I ________ I Paul Lung
I ( HK usp I psl...@ucdavis.edu
I -------I
I /^^\ I Cars kill people! Let's ban them!
I____|____|____I (Or limit them to 5 gallon gas tanks)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: ez01...@bullwinkle.ucdavis.edu (Paul Lung) Subject: Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C Date: 1996/04/08 Message-ID: <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu> X-Deja-AN: 146543249 references: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> followup-to: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command.and.conquer organization: University of California, Davis newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command.and.conquer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit