Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C

Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer

Article #902

Back to alt.games.command.and.conquer Previous Next

#902

From: t... Tim Hayes
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 00:00

25 lines
1351 bytes

ez01...@bullwinkle.ucdavis.edu (Paul Lung) wrote:

>Nathan Palovcik (am...@elycion.geology.ualberta.ca) wrote:
>: I will give C&C high marks for it's humour, the music & SFX, IMHO better than 
>: Warcraft.  'Daboo!' just can't measure up against blood-curdling death 
>: screams. ;>

>I find C&C a much better game design because there are different tactics
>if you play different sides. For WCII, we have the exact same units on
>both sides, so there really is no difference which side you play.
>-- 

I agree!  C & C has lots of variation, and is a great game overall.  I
wished C & C had SVGA graphics though, but still their cut scenes were
much better then WC II.  

Warcraft II lacks something.  It's enioyable to play, but I felt in
the game with C & C, and yet I don't feel that way with WC II.  The
sides are too similar....:/

Regards,

Tim Hayes
http://members.aol.com/thelimit

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4kfa72$vuc@aegis.nitco.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: t...@nitco.com (Tim Hayes)
Subject: Re: Warcraft II  vs. C&C
Date: 1996/04/10
Message-ID: <4kfa72$vuc@aegis.nitco.com>
X-Deja-AN: 146667211
references: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu>
organization: Northwest Indiana Telephone Company
newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command.and.conquer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message