🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 2018-03-17, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> CBS News:
>
> A prominent data analytics firm that worked with President Trump's 
> campaign exploited Facebook data to harvest "millions" of profiles 
> of U.S. voters without their authorization, according to a
> whistleblower who once worked to help acquire the data. On 
> Friday, Facebook announced Cambridge Analytica — the firm that 
> was created by billionaire donor Robert Mercer, previously run 
> by Steve Bannon, who went on to become White House chief 
> strategist, and received $5.9 million from Trump's 2016 
> presidential campaign — has been suspended for violating the 
> social media company's standards and practices.
>
> full detailed article at
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cambridge-analytica-firm-that-helped-trumps-campaign-harvested-50-million-facebook-profiles/

TL;DR, but how is that different from what's already known?  I.e. that
the campaign used Facebook like this:

- Create focus groups.
- Say something in public.
- Watch how the groups react (via Facebook and Facebook trackers on
  various web pages).
- Tweak the message to maximize the effect.
- Repeat.

Facebook sells the tools to do this, and it's all very effective, and
apparently legal.

/Jorgen

-- 
  // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@  Oo  o.   .     .
\X/     snipabacken.se>   O  o   .

On 2018-03-17, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com <hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
> CBS News:
>
> A prominent data analytics firm that worked with President Trump's 
> campaign exploited Facebook data to harvest "millions" of profiles 
> of U.S. voters without their authorization, according to a
> whistleblower who once worked to help acquire the data. On 
> Friday, Facebook announced Cambridge Analytica — the firm that 
> was created by billionaire donor Robert Mercer, previously run 
> by Steve Bannon, who went on to become White House chief 
> strategist, and received $5.9 million from Trump's 2016 
> presidential campaign — has been suspended for violating the 
> social media company's standards and practices.
>
> full detailed article at
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cambridge-analytica-firm-that-helped-trumps-campaign-harvested-50-million-facebook-profiles/

Wow!.. Facebook has standards?


-- 
greymaus.ireland.ie
Just_Another_Grumpy_Old_Man

On Sat, 2018-03-17, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-03-17, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>> CBS News:
>>
>> A prominent data analytics firm that worked with President Trump's 
>> campaign exploited Facebook data to harvest "millions" of profiles 
>> of U.S. voters without their authorization, according to a
>> whistleblower who once worked to help acquire the data. On 
>> Friday, Facebook announced Cambridge Analytica — the firm that 
>> was created by billionaire donor Robert Mercer, previously run 
>> by Steve Bannon, who went on to become White House chief 
>> strategist, and received $5.9 million from Trump's 2016 
>> presidential campaign — has been suspended for violating the 
>> social media company's standards and practices.
>>
>> full detailed article at
>> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cambridge-analytica-firm-that-helped-trumps-campaign-harvested-50-million-facebook-profiles/
>
> TL;DR, but how is that different from what's already known?  I.e. that
> the campaign used Facebook like this:
>
> - Create focus groups.
> - Say something in public.
> - Watch how the groups react (via Facebook and Facebook trackers on
>   various web pages).
> - Tweak the message to maximize the effect.
> - Repeat.
>
> Facebook sells the tools to do this, and it's all very effective, and
> apparently legal.

The thing linked above is all over the news this morning, so I guess
it must be important and damaging.  I just wonder if it was more
useful to the campaign than the official Facebook tools.

/Jorgen

-- 
  // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@  Oo  o.   .     .
\X/     snipabacken.se>   O  o   .

On 2018-03-18, Jorgen Grahn <grahn...@snipabacken.se> wrote:

> On Sat, 2018-03-17, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2018-03-17, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>>
>>> CBS News:
>>>
>>> A prominent data analytics firm that worked with President Trump's 
>>> campaign exploited Facebook data to harvest "millions" of profiles 
>>> of U.S. voters without their authorization, according to a
>>> whistleblower who once worked to help acquire the data. On 
>>> Friday, Facebook announced Cambridge Analytica — the firm that 
>>> was created by billionaire donor Robert Mercer, previously run 
>>> by Steve Bannon, who went on to become White House chief 
>>> strategist, and received $5.9 million from Trump's 2016 
>>> presidential campaign — has been suspended for violating the 
>>> social media company's standards and practices.
>>>
>>> full detailed article at
>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cambridge-analytica-firm-that-helped-trumps-campaign-harvested-50-million-facebook-profiles/
>>
>> TL;DR, but how is that different from what's already known?  I.e. that
>> the campaign used Facebook like this:
>>
>> - Create focus groups.
>> - Say something in public.
>> - Watch how the groups react (via Facebook and Facebook trackers on
>>   various web pages).
>> - Tweak the message to maximize the effect.
>> - Repeat.
>>
>> Facebook sells the tools to do this, and it's all very effective, and
>> apparently legal.
>
> The thing linked above is all over the news this morning, so I guess
> it must be important and damaging.  I just wonder if it was more
> useful to the campaign than the official Facebook tools.

It helped get Trump elected, so it must have been useful.

-- 
/~\  cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ /  I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
 X   Top-posted messages will probably be ignored.  See RFC1855.
/ \  HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored.  Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!