Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #4032Re: PzG Navy contra arty (was Re: PzG Norway suggestions????)
From: Thierry Lejealle
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 00:00
25 lines
1696 bytes
1696 bytes
>No, I think you are correct. Someone else pointed out that the Ju88 was originally designed as
>a dive-bomber, but it is treated as a level bomber in the game. In the Pacific, level bombing
>from B17s was pretty ineffective.
>I guess we'll just have to put it down to another historical inaccuracy in PG (like those 3
>range SIG SPGs - real life max range 2500m).
I think there's a point where the game is very wrong to : it's bomber.
Okay IU know huge allied level bombers where sometimes used against troops, though
their main use was against industry and cities.
However I believe the german level bombers are hardly
bigger than the US tactical bomber (B25, B26) in PG. I'd rather classify
them all in medium bombers, as in PacWar.
I wonder why in earth a B29 doesn't inflict more dammage than
a far smaller german level bomber...
I hope the sequel to PzG will be as great as the original one !
I think it seted a new standard as for this kind of computer wargame !
---
*CODEX*
Pyrite Dragon of * gangway !!! /*
--=(UDIC)=-- senile Dragon *:} =***
E-Mail : leje...@email.enst.fr \*
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<44dnsf$dr@lsi.lsil.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<44bdhh$hvv@hippo.shef.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: thierry@pfrec42.Paris01 (Thierry Lejealle) Subject: Re: PzG Navy contra arty (was Re: PzG Norway suggestions????) Date: 1995/09/28 Message-ID: <44dnsf$dr@lsi.lsil.com> X-Deja-AN: 110917383 distribution: world references: <44bdhh$hvv@hippo.shef.ac.uk> organization: LSI Logic Corporation reply-to: thierry@pfrec42.Paris01 newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit