🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <423sql$m...@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>, dona...@ix.netcom.com (Donald Collins) writes:
> In <DE61E...@cunews.carleton.ca> ch...@chat.carleton.ca (Calvin Htut)
> writes: 
>>
>>Gene (ge...@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com) wrote:
>>> If that cheesy 'Hover' game is ANY indication of how, 'smooth',
> games
>>> can run under Win95 using the built in routines offered by
> Win95......
>>> I'll stick with DOS!! I mean, the game updated at like 1 frame every
>>> 20 seconds.
>>>  And if ONE person says I have a slow system and it runs nice on
> THEIR
>>> system...... I'll personally hunt you down and beat you up for being
> so
>>> stupid! I'm not some newbie with a 386SX-16.
>>>  The game is slow on every system I've seen it on. That ranges from
>>> DX4-100s to P90s to my P133 with a Stingray PCI video card. (Pumping
>>> out 132fps in 3DBench!!!!!!!!!!!)
>>
> If by "built in routines" you are referring to something other that
> WinG, it shows how uneducated and stupid you are.  If you are referring
> to something that uses WinG, then either the game was programmed by an
> idiot, or..?  My friend is writing a game using WinG, and on his DX2-66
> it clears and redraws part of a 320X240 window at 50fps.


I read that microsoft was abandoning WinG in favor of the DDI something or
another that most 3D cards will be using.