Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #2362

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#2362

From: mlav... Michael Lavallee
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 00:00

15 lines
1262 bytes

In message <Kuzma.111...@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu> - Kuzma@uhunix.uhcc.hawa
ii.edu (Cyber Ice) writes:

:>Who has established anything? Win95's Support for hardware and software blows 
:>OS/2 out of the water!

Hardware?  Possiblly.  Software?  Wrong.  OS/2 will run more software than 
Windows 95.  Windows 95 can run most DOS and Windows 3.1 software.  OS/2 can 
as well - and it can run OS/2 software.  There are very few native Windows 95 
applications out at this time.

//----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Michael Lavallee
// mlav...@ViaNet.on.ca
// Team OS/2

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3v47kr$atd@dragon.solect.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<3q8ngd$rej@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <3t1tmv$a1i@moe.cc.emory.edu> <zTV2mqrPwVeM078yn@vestnett.no> <3ui0ma$e0b@nuscc.nus.sg> <DC3FqL.AnM@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <3ur5qs$f8_002@line04.socketis.net> <3us9re$ano@alpha.wright.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: mlav...@ViaNet.on.ca (Michael Lavallee)
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs Win'95(or '96)
Date: 1995/07/26
Message-ID: <3v47kr$atd@dragon.solect.com>
X-Deja-AN: 106861936
references: <3q8ngd$rej@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <3t1tmv$a1i@moe.cc.emory.edu> <zTV2mqrPwVeM078yn@vestnett.no> <3ui0ma$e0b@nuscc.nus.sg> <DC3FqL.AnM@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <3ur5qs$f8_002@line04.socketis.net> <3us9re$ano@alpha.wright.edu>
organization: Solect Technology Group
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message