🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi,

To be honest, if you are making that many changes, should it be incorprated
into XCom 6 instead?

Lee

- ^ - ^- ^ - ^- ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ -
^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^

Editor of:
100% ZX Spectrum: http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/pascoe/633/
100% Thunder: http://www.fortunecity.com/tinpan/carpenters/512/

Other Web Pages:
University Page: http://www.uel.ac.uk/pers/1742m/
Personal Page: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~friend/

- ^ - ^- ^ - ^- ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^ -
^ - ^ - ^ - ^ - ^
> SVGA graphics, easy user customization, native Windows interface (GODS
>but I loathe DOS!), base game speed adjusted for the processor speed,
>trashing that damnable 80-item limit to the 10th pit of hell from which
>it oozed, other bug fixes, improved interactivity with the environment
>(barns collapse after the lower floors get blaster-bombed), eye candy
>like cut scenes of researched technology and plot advancement.  Just
>about everything about the squad combat of the original works for me
>(and in fact I'd consider it sacrilege to mess with it TOO much), but I
>wouldn't mind an expansion in the interception department.
> Really, I'd consider it as a perfect opportunity to apply general
>improvements to the game as a whole in the same manner that
>Civilization2 improved on the original Civilization.  An EVolution
>rather than REVolution.
>
>--
>Duane VanderPol: dua...@earthlink.net or dua...@aol.com
>Castle of the Glowing Sky: http://home.earthlink.net/~duanevp/index.html
>"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards for they are subtle and quick
>to anger" - Tolkien
>"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" -
>Clarke