🚀 go-pugleaf

Nick wrote:
> 
> Not claiming to have tons of knowledge on the subject, but I belive the
> relativity theory (I just barely undestand it) and yet that assumed
> boundreys on speeds and exsistence thereabout and their relationship to
> perception don't hold water.

What a fascinating statement... "I don't know anything about it, I don't
understand it, but I think it's bunk."  Gee, we are putting on the
thinking caps today, aren't we?

Sounds like you're one of those militia types:  "The government did it,
so it must be bad."  Or one of those religious types:  "The scientists
said it, so it must be bad."  Or one of those AOL-types:  "I don't
understand, so it must be bad."  <g>

The wonderful thing about the theory of relativity is that it is so
incredibly intuitive and easy to understand, once you put a tiny bit of
effort into it.  Check out that article I posted about earlier on
http://www.washingtonpost.com/!

-- 
John M. Aldrich <figh...@cs.com>                      

* Anything that happens, happens.
* Anything that, in happening, causes something else to happen,
  causes something else to happen.
* Anything that, in happening, causes itself to happen again, happens
  again.
* It doesn't necessarily do it in chronological order, though.
 
                                       --- Douglas Adams