Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #353178Re: Lightspeed constant...
From: Nick
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:00
50 lines
3135 bytes
3135 bytes
John M. Aldrich wrote: > > Mike Sprayberry wrote: > > > > Wait....Suppose the Earth (or any object) IS traveling at .9999c. As > > you say, we would never know it. BUT, if a jet is flying around the > > Earth toward the direction that the Earth is traveling through space, > > would the jet be doing the theoretically impossible?? Traveling FASTER > > than light?? Could this happen?? > > > > A better example...accelerate a gun to .9999c. Then fire the gun...does > > the bullet break the light speed limitation (relative to a "stationary" > > observer)??? > > Hmm... what did I just say? Motion, or rather the appearance of motion, > is relative! In the cases you mention, we would see the plane moving at > whatever speed it was moving. From the point of view of some > theoretical "stationary" point in space, the plane would be moving just > a tiny bit faster than the Earth, but still less than the speed of > light. Ditto with the bullet. > > Applying acceleration to an object always appears to have the same > effect _from the point of view of the object_. This applies whether you > are talking about spaceships, airplanes, stars, or bullets. The > relativistic equations make this apparently counterintuitive fact not > just possible, but obvious. In fact, it isn't even counterintuitive at > all - it makes perfect sense when you look at it right. > > -- > John M. Aldrich <figh...@cs.com> > > * Anything that happens, happens. > * Anything that, in happening, causes something else to happen, > causes something else to happen. > * Anything that, in happening, causes itself to happen again, happens > again. > * It doesn't necessarily do it in chronological order, though. > > --- Douglas Adams Not claiming to have tons of knowledge on the subject, but I belive the relativity theory (I just barely undestand it) and yet that assumed boundreys on speeds and exsistence thereabout and their relationship to perception don't hold water. -- -Nick ;:-) Visit my homepage! http://www.wolfenet.com/~paradox/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32B0C11D.7670@wolfenet.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<574e67$1hb@mippet.ci.com.au> <01bbe156$56e4e8a0$2ddcdbcd@maxkilms.nidlink.com> <32A4E35B.3347@pop.erols.com> <32A62F6B.5F90@hg.uleth.ca> <32A6646B.1801@fsl.com.sg> <32A72439.3C05@clinton.net> <Pine.OSF.3.95.961205182254.32105A-100000@wpi.WPI.EDU> <32A8AF7A.5F7C@enternet.co.nz> <32A9C8EF.1ACC@cs.com> <32AB03E7.3775@internetMCI.com> <32B0D640.31ED@cs.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Nick <par...@wolfenet.com> Subject: Re: Lightspeed constant... Date: 1996/12/12 Message-ID: <32B0C11D.7670@wolfenet.com> X-Deja-AN: 203830008 references: <574e67$1hb@mippet.ci.com.au> <01bbe156$56e4e8a0$2ddcdbcd@maxkilms.nidlink.com> <32A4E35B.3347@pop.erols.com> <32A62F6B.5F90@hg.uleth.ca> <32A6646B.1801@fsl.com.sg> <32A72439.3C05@clinton.net> <Pine.OSF.3.95.961205182254.32105A-100000@wpi.WPI.EDU> <32A8AF7A.5F7C@enternet.co.nz> <32A9C8EF.1ACC@cs.com> <32AB03E7.3775@internetMCI.com> <32B0D640.31ED@cs.com> organization: Wolfe Internet Access, L.L.C. mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: par...@wolfenet.com newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.multimedia,comp.graphics.animation,alt.games.doom,alt.games.descent,alt.games.warcraft,comp.graphics,comp.graphics.animation,alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.os.os2.mi x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit