🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <nRed2.3241$961....@server1.news.adelphia.net>, 
tabmok99....@damnspaz.com says...
> > So how do you feel about Rosanne Barr?
> 
> I never liked her show, I'm glad it was cancelled, and they had way too much 
> gay stuff in it.  In our society (societies, rather) sex sells.  What sells 
> a lot these days is anything to do with homosexuality (movies like "In & Out"
> and "The Birdcage").  And that's a Bad Thing.

Do you not remember that before the sexual revolution the same was 
thought of heterosexual sex? It was considered taboo. Fuck me only 100 
years ago you were not allowed to show any flesh beyond you face and 
hands. Have you seen pictures of bathing suites from the turn of the 
century? These days we do not even where that many clothes when fully 
dressed! ;)

Things change. 

> It is based on a reason, in fact several of which I gave you.
> 
> Besides all the mentionings of it in the Bible, it is a crime against
> nature.  Why do you think two men (or two women) cannot produce a baby?

So do you consider sex to be purely about reproduction?

What about shared intimacy and pleasure?

> > > a wonderful occasion, and it's also beautiful to have something to show
> > > for it (wedding rings) to remind you of your promise.
> > 
> > So you think people need reminding? When I commit to another person I do 
> > not need some reminder of it. I consider my commitment complete without 
> > needing a token to remind me of it at all times!
> 
> Good for you.  Maybe marriage isn't for everyone.  It shows that a man and a 
> woman are willing to stay with each other forever, and it's a celebration of 

Unless they divorce or apply for the marriage to be annulled. 

> > > We can do it, and if other humans wanted to, they could also.
> > 
> > I don't think they could!
> 
> And you think otters could build pipes and sinks and faucets and crap :P

I think if they needed to then yes they probably could. 

Want != need.

> > Why? He is not being malicious. He is following his fucked up desires. As 
> > would you be by killing a homosexual.
> 
> But my desires can at least be backed up.

By what? The bible? What else?

> > > I could never actually kill someone, so it wouldn't happen anyway.
> > > I could see myself *charged* with murder, but that doesn't make it so.
> > 
> > I would consider you a murderer.
> 
> Well, you'd be wrong then.

Only in your eyes.

> > > As for the maliciousness, it's just like some government agents giving
> > > someone the electric chair.
> > 
> > But are they not implemented *God's* law for people like you who do not 
> > have the courage to do so? :P
> 
> It's not so much the courage, it's more squeamishness then anything.

Yeah I am sure it is ;)

-- 
Mark