πŸš€ go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.games.lucas-arts.monkey-island
83 messages
83 total messages Page 1 of 2 Started by Bouffont Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:50
Page 1 of 2 β€’ 83 total messages
You Better Recognise
#236322
Author: Bouffont
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:50
7 lines
1162 bytes
You better recognise me fools.

Time for my random 2 year visit.

And how are we all?

Mr Bouffont
Re: You Better Recognise
#236323
Author: Sean
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:40
8 lines
1407 bytes
Bouffont skrev:
> You better recognise me fools.
> 
> Time for my random 2 year visit.
> 
> And how are we all?

Very very quiet.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236329
Author: Kasper
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:19
15 lines
1163 bytes
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:50:40 -0700, Bouffont <bouffont@gmail.com>
wrote:

>You better recognise me fools.
>
>Time for my random 2 year visit.
>
>And how are we all?
>
>Mr Bouffont

Jungle?

-- 
Kasper
Re: You Better Recognise
#236332
Author: Steve Leyland
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:50
84 lines
4253 bytes
Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called Bouffont 
stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to usenet:

: You better recognise me fools.
:
: Time for my random 2 year visit.
:
: And how are we all?

I'm just fine and dandy, thanks so much fer axin.
:
: Mr Bouffont

who are you again?

-- 
Steve Leyland
mhm32x16  Smeeter#24 WSD#41 Most Hated Usenetizen Of All Time#1
Top Asshole on the Net#4 Usenet Ruiner#11 Lits Slut#1
Alcatroll Labs Inc (bongwater maintenance dept)

  =^MEOW MEOW ARMY^=

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the
subject. - Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill
======================================================================
"Warning to all: Steve Leyland is a trolling twat of the highest order.
Killfile the muppet now and move on. Even the briefest of searches on
his past UseNet posts will reveal the truth. You have been warned.
*plonk*" bear, uk.rec.motorcycles
======================================================================
 "I didn't delete any part of your meaningless, pointless, worthless
post in order to clearly demonstrate that you are the nemesis of
Usenet:  the crossposting, non-editing, diagram-creating worthless,
dickless, brainless, gutless, mindless, ball-less, spineless, flaccid,
obese, fish-belly pale, ugly, VD-ridden, moronic, bald, hunch-backed,
flat-footed, odoriferous, obnoxious, fecal-smelling, buck-toothed,
physically handicapped, fungus-infected, HIV positive, mud-packing,
masturbating, whining, simpering, self-important, arrogant, egomaniacal
POS that takes up more bandwidth than a despicable binary-poster, and
for no apparent reason beyond seeing his own defecatory vomitus
slithering down the screen in vile green rivulets."

Admiral Halsey, alt.sailing.asa
======================================================================
"I went to the Garden of Love,
  And saw what I never had seen;
A Chapel was built in the midst,
  Where I used to play on the green.

And the gates of this Chapel were shut
  And "Thou shalt not," writ over the door;
So I turned to the Garden of Love
  That so many sweet flowers bore.

And I saw it was filled with graves,
  And tombstones where flowers should be;
And priests in black gowns were walking their rounds,
  And binding with briars my joys and desires."

William Blake.
======================================================================
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this
right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to
seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and
regardless of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
article 19.
======================================================================
"When the Earth has been ravaged and the animals are dying, a tribe of
people from all races, creeds and colours shall put their faith in
deeds, not words, and make the land green again. They shall be known as
Warriors of the Rainbow, protectors of the environment."

Native American prophecy

      |\            _.-'~~""'~`'~)
     /, ~-,__,,,.'~      ,-;;--''
    |,4) ./  '     ;    ;/'
   '-~~;'@        (   ; ;
   _.--''    _.-_..'  .;.'
  (,_..----''' (,..--''


  meow.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236334
Author: blondestranger
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:12
20 lines
1680 bytes
this is where i'd say something clever about Bouffont, if i could be
bothered:

>You better recognise me fools.
>
>Time for my random 2 year visit.
>
>And how are we all?
>
>Mr Bouffont

/sits on bev's lap
so how are we these days?
-- 

 €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,Blondestranger,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€
          €º°`°º€€º°`°º€€º°`°º€
             www.deblon.com
              fear the towel!!
            
Re: You Better Recognise
#236324
Author: Bouffont
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:25
12 lines
1451 bytes
On Oct 1, 8:40 pm, Sean <sg...@hotpop.spamtrap.com> wrote:
> Bouffont skrev:
>
> > You better recognise me fools.
>
> > Time for my random 2 year visit.
>
> > And how are we all?
>
> Very very quiet.

Noise Please
Re: You Better Recognise
#236330
Author: Bouffont
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:25
16 lines
1520 bytes
On Oct 2, 5:19 am, Kasper <nos...@thanks.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:50:40 -0700, Bouffont <bouff...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >You better recognise me fools.
>
> >Time for my random 2 year visit.
>
> >And how are we all?
>
> >Mr Bouffont
>
> Jungle?
>

Fever?
Re: You Better Recognise
#236333
Author: Bouffont
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:26
18 lines
1713 bytes
On Oct 2, 1:50 pm, "Steve Leyland"
<steveREMOVEDOTINVALIDTORE...@meow.org.invalid> wrote:
> Once upon a time in a magickal land far far away the being called Bouffont
> stirred from its deep slumber and pronounced to usenet:
>
> : You better recognise me fools.
> :
> : Time for my random 2 year visit.
> :
> : And how are we all?
>
> I'm just fine and dandy, thanks so much fer axin.
> :
> : Mr Bouffont
>
> who are you again?

The beholder of the Kiona, Bev.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236335
Author: Bouffont
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:27
16 lines
1585 bytes
On Oct 4, 11:12 pm, blondestranger <deb...@mailinator.com> wrote:
> this is where i'd say something clever about Bouffont, if i could be
> bothered:
>
> >You better recognise me fools.
>
> >Time for my random 2 year visit.
>
> >And how are we all?
>
> >Mr Bouffont
>
> /sits on bev's lap
> so how are we these days?

Mostly aroused.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236325
Author: Sean
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:32
10 lines
1567 bytes
Bouffont skrev:

>>> You better recognise me fools.
>>> Time for my random 2 year visit.
>>> And how are we all?
>> Very very quiet.
> 
> Noise Please

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236326
Author: Kasper
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:40
16 lines
1372 bytes
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:32:13 +0200, Sean <sgegg@hotpop.spamtrap.com>
wrote:

>>>> You better recognise me fools.
>>>> Time for my random 2 year visit.
>>>> And how are we all?
>>> Very very quiet.
>> 
>> Noise Please
>
>Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

No, it's Aae. Kasper Aae.

-- 
Kasper
Re: You Better Recognise
#236331
Author: Kasper
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:40
20 lines
1324 bytes
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:25:44 -0700, Bouffont <bouffont@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> >You better recognise me fools.
>>
>> >Time for my random 2 year visit.
>>
>> >And how are we all?
>>
>> >Mr Bouffont
>>
>> Jungle?
>>
>
>Fever?

IS MASSIVE, IDIOT!

-- 
Kasper
Re: You Better Recognise
#236327
Author: Sean
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:54
12 lines
1689 bytes
Kasper skrev:

>>>>> You better recognise me fools.
>>>>> Time for my random 2 year visit.
>>>>> And how are we all?
>>>> Very very quiet.
>>> Noise Please
>> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
> 
> No, it's Aae. Kasper Aae.

Aye.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236328
Author: Kasper
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:46
18 lines
1464 bytes
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:54:53 +0200, Sean <sgegg@hotpop.spamtrap.com>
wrote:

>>>>>> You better recognise me fools.
>>>>>> Time for my random 2 year visit.
>>>>>> And how are we all?
>>>>> Very very quiet.
>>>> Noise Please
>>> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
>> 
>> No, it's Aae. Kasper Aae.
>
>Aye.

Argh!

-- 
Kasper
Re: You Better Recognise
#236336
Author: blondestranger
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:06
28 lines
2011 bytes
this is where i'd say something clever about Bouffont, if i could be
bothered:

>On Oct 4, 11:12 pm, blondestranger <deb...@mailinator.com> wrote:
>> this is where i'd say something clever about Bouffont, if i could be
>> bothered:
>>
>> >You better recognise me fools.
>>
>> >Time for my random 2 year visit.
>>
>> >And how are we all?
>>
>> >Mr Bouffont
>>
>> /sits on bev's lap
>> so how are we these days?
>
>Mostly aroused.

i nearly smiled for you
-- 

 €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,Blondestranger,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€
          €º°`°º€€º°`°º€€º°`°º€
             www.deblon.com
              fear the towel!!
            
Re: You Better Recognise
#236337
Author: ervaqre
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:25
9 lines
1144 bytes
blondestranger is a real pirate:
| >Mostly aroused.
| 
| i nearly smiled for you

buuht it is teh smiles of tah mankeh mahn!!!

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236338
Author: blondestranger
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:11
18 lines
1867 bytes
this is where i'd say something clever about ervaqre, if i could be
bothered:

>blondestranger is a real pirate:
>| >Mostly aroused.
>| 
>| i nearly smiled for you
>
>buuht it is teh smiles of tah mankeh mahn!!!

the things you say
-- 

 €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,Blondestranger,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€
          €º°`°º€€º°`°º€€º°`°º€
             www.deblon.com
              fear the towel!!
            
Re: You Better Recognise
#236339
Author: ervaqre
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:09
13 lines
1737 bytes
blondestranger is a real pirate:

>>| i nearly smiled for you
>>
>>buuht it is teh smiles of tah mankeh mahn!!!
> 
> the things you say

they're nothing compared to the things i do, for instance, yesterday i tried
this http://youporn.com/watch/2920 position with the immortal elephant

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236340
Author: blondestranger
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:53
22 lines
2120 bytes
this is where i'd say something clever about ervaqre, if i could be
bothered:

>blondestranger is a real pirate:
>
>>>| i nearly smiled for you
>>>
>>>buuht it is teh smiles of tah mankeh mahn!!!
>> 
>> the things you say
>
>they're nothing compared to the things i do, for instance, yesterday i tried
>this http://youporn.com/watch/2920 position with the immortal elephant

necrophilia is icky
-- 

 €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,Blondestranger,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€
          €º°`°º€€º°`°º€€º°`°º€
             www.deblon.com
              fear the towel!!
            
Re: You Better Recognise
#236341
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:35
11 lines
1779 bytes
blondestranger schreef:
>>> the things you say
>> they're nothing compared to the things i do, for instance, yesterday i tried
>> this http://youporn.com/watch/2920 position with the immortal elephant
> 
> necrophilia is icky

Good thing the elephant is immortal. And immoral.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236360
Author: ervaqre
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:19
12 lines
1913 bytes
blondestranger is a real pirate...
| >they're nothing compared to the things i do, for instance, yesterday i tried
| >this http://youporn.com/watch/2920 position with the immortal elephant
| 
| necrophilia is icky

the girl in that video looks pretty much alive to me, but how do you 
know it's icky? did you ever take a dead man's penis inside of you? or 
give a dead guy a blowjob? please tell us. details, yes. please.

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236342
Author: ervaqre
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:20
10 lines
1693 bytes
DG is a real pirate...
| > necrophilia is icky
| 
| Good thing the elephant is immortal. And immoral.

I just tried searching for "Immortal Elephant" on Wikipedia, but they 
don't have an entry on it :(

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236343
Author: DG
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:30
40 lines
3497 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
> | > necrophilia is icky
> | 
> | Good thing the elephant is immortal. And immoral.
> 
> I just tried searching for "Immortal Elephant" on Wikipedia, but they 
> don't have an entry on it :(
> 
You need to know where to look.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunalpatel

Kunalpatel
 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
. Find out more about navigating Wikipedia and finding information .
Jump to: navigation, search

Kunalpatel is a giant elephant of an ancient Hindu legend. Scrolls from 
the 20th century B.C. claim sightings of the storied elephant and report 
it to be twice the size of a normal elephant. From various reports, 
historians have approximated Kunalpatel would have outweighed Angola, 
the largest recorded elephant that weighed in at over 12,000 kg (26,400 lb).

According to the legend, Kunalpatel guarded a giant cave full of gold in 
ancient India. The Hindu God Vishnu hid this sacred gold in the cave for 
King Rama. Vishnu created this giant elephant in order to keep the gold 
safe until King Rama retrieved it. King Rama was considered by many to 
be the Seventh Avatara of Vishnu and it was proclaimed he would use this 
gold to become emperor of the world [1]. As Kunalpatel waited through 
the ages for the coming of Rama, he grew hungry. As the legend goes, one 
day he left the cave and feasted on bad Indian children that wandered 
into the jungle. Indians used to scare their children into staying out 
of jungle by telling stories of Kunalpatel. Kunalpatel gorged too 
heavily and upon returning to the cave was too large and got stuck in 
the mouth of the cave. When Rama came for the gold as the legend 
foretold, Kunalpatel prevented him from retrieving the gold. As the 
legend goes, the gold is still in the cave, guarded by the giant 
immortal elephant, and unable to be reached [2].

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236358
Author: blondestranger
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:46
20 lines
2208 bytes
this is where i'd say something clever about DG, if i could be
bothered:

>blondestranger schreef:
>>>> the things you say
>>> they're nothing compared to the things i do, for instance, yesterday i tried
>>> this http://youporn.com/watch/2920 position with the immortal elephant
>> 
>> necrophilia is icky
>
>Good thing the elephant is immortal. And immoral.

the immortal elephant is dead.  DEAD!	
-- 

 €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,Blondestranger,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€
          €º°`°º€€º°`°º€€º°`°º€
             www.deblon.com
              fear the towel!!
            
Re: You Better Recognise
#236361
Author: blondestranger
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:49
23 lines
2540 bytes
this is where i'd say something clever about ervaqre, if i could be
bothered:

>blondestranger is a real pirate...
>| >they're nothing compared to the things i do, for instance, yesterday i tried
>| >this http://youporn.com/watch/2920 position with the immortal elephant
>| 
>| necrophilia is icky
>
>the girl in that video looks pretty much alive to me, but how do you 
>know it's icky? did you ever take a dead man's penis inside of you? or 
>give a dead guy a blowjob? please tell us. details, yes. please.

well....there was this one time, at band camp........only NO.  i know
necrophilia is icky the same way i know eating poo is icky.  it's icky
in that 'i'm never going to try it to be absolutely certain' way.
-- 

 €º°`°º€ø,¸¸,Blondestranger,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€
          €º°`°º€€º°`°º€€º°`°º€
             www.deblon.com
              fear the towel!!
            
Re: You Better Recognise
#236359
Author: DG
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:53
12 lines
1979 bytes
blondestranger schreef:
>>>> they're nothing compared to the things i do, for instance, yesterday i tried
>>>> this http://youporn.com/watch/2920 position with the immortal elephant
>>> necrophilia is icky
>> Good thing the elephant is immortal. And immoral.
> 
> the immortal elephant is dead.  DEAD!	

That flies in the face of truth in labeling.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236344
Author: ervaqre
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:52
39 lines
3580 bytes
DG is a real pirate...
| > I just tried searching for "Immortal Elephant" on Wikipedia, but they 
| > don't have an entry on it :(
| > 
| You need to know where to look.
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunalpatel
| 
| Kunalpatel
|  From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| . Find out more about navigating Wikipedia and finding information .
| Jump to: navigation, search
| 
| Kunalpatel is a giant elephant of an ancient Hindu legend. Scrolls from 
| the 20th century B.C. claim sightings of the storied elephant and report 
| it to be twice the size of a normal elephant. From various reports, 
| historians have approximated Kunalpatel would have outweighed Angola, 
| the largest recorded elephant that weighed in at over 12,000 kg (26,400 lb).
| 
| According to the legend, Kunalpatel guarded a giant cave full of gold in 
| ancient India. The Hindu God Vishnu hid this sacred gold in the cave for 
| King Rama. Vishnu created this giant elephant in order to keep the gold 
| safe until King Rama retrieved it. King Rama was considered by many to 
| be the Seventh Avatara of Vishnu and it was proclaimed he would use this 
| gold to become emperor of the world [1]. As Kunalpatel waited through 
| the ages for the coming of Rama, he grew hungry. As the legend goes, one 
| day he left the cave and feasted on bad Indian children that wandered 
| into the jungle. Indians used to scare their children into staying out 
| of jungle by telling stories of Kunalpatel. Kunalpatel gorged too 
| heavily and upon returning to the cave was too large and got stuck in 
| the mouth of the cave. When Rama came for the gold as the legend 
| foretold, Kunalpatel prevented him from retrieving the gold. As the 
| legend goes, the gold is still in the cave, guarded by the giant 
| immortal elephant, and unable to be reached [2].

Aha!! That explains it all! This also means the history of Aglami goes 
back 4000 years! We're older than Jesus Christ!!

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236362
Author: ervaqre
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:54
15 lines
2180 bytes
blondestranger is a real pirate...
| >the girl in that video looks pretty much alive to me, but how do you 
| >know it's icky? did you ever take a dead man's penis inside of you? or 
| >give a dead guy a blowjob? please tell us. details, yes. please.
| 
| well....there was this one time, at band camp........only NO.  i know
| necrophilia is icky the same way i know eating poo is icky.  it's icky
| in that 'i'm never going to try it to be absolutely certain' way.

hmm..I've seen many poo eating videos...but never one featuring hot and 
horny necrophilia. if some day you change your mind, please record it 
and show me the video. 

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236345
Author: DG
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:51
43 lines
3943 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
> | You need to know where to look.
> | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunalpatel
> | 
> | Kunalpatel
> |  From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> | . Find out more about navigating Wikipedia and finding information .
> | Jump to: navigation, search
> | 
> | Kunalpatel is a giant elephant of an ancient Hindu legend. Scrolls from 
> | the 20th century B.C. claim sightings of the storied elephant and report 
> | it to be twice the size of a normal elephant. From various reports, 
> | historians have approximated Kunalpatel would have outweighed Angola, 
> | the largest recorded elephant that weighed in at over 12,000 kg (26,400 lb).
> | 
> | According to the legend, Kunalpatel guarded a giant cave full of gold in 
> | ancient India. The Hindu God Vishnu hid this sacred gold in the cave for 
> | King Rama. Vishnu created this giant elephant in order to keep the gold 
> | safe until King Rama retrieved it. King Rama was considered by many to 
> | be the Seventh Avatara of Vishnu and it was proclaimed he would use this 
> | gold to become emperor of the world [1]. As Kunalpatel waited through 
> | the ages for the coming of Rama, he grew hungry. As the legend goes, one 
> | day he left the cave and feasted on bad Indian children that wandered 
> | into the jungle. Indians used to scare their children into staying out 
> | of jungle by telling stories of Kunalpatel. Kunalpatel gorged too 
> | heavily and upon returning to the cave was too large and got stuck in 
> | the mouth of the cave. When Rama came for the gold as the legend 
> | foretold, Kunalpatel prevented him from retrieving the gold. As the 
> | legend goes, the gold is still in the cave, guarded by the giant 
> | immortal elephant, and unable to be reached [2].
> 
> Aha!! That explains it all! This also means the history of Aglami goes 
> back 4000 years! We're older than Jesus Christ!!
> 
There once was a guy that claimed - for a lark - he and his friends were 
more popular than fore mentioned savior. He was murdered in 1980.

Just thought you'd like to know you might be better off claiming you're 
older than Homer, Ikhnaton, Solomon, Rome and some other stuff. Unlike 
Kunalpatel you're not immortal.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236363
Author: DG
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:55
14 lines
2190 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
> | well....there was this one time, at band camp........only NO.  i know
> | necrophilia is icky the same way i know eating poo is icky.  it's icky
> | in that 'i'm never going to try it to be absolutely certain' way.
> 
> hmm..I've seen many poo eating videos...but never one featuring hot and 
> horny necrophilia. if some day you change your mind, please record it 
> and show me the video. 
> 
And here I was thinking that the whole donut hole/muffin thing was a bit 
iffy.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236346
Author: ervaqre
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:36
12 lines
2091 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
> There once was a guy that claimed - for a lark - he and his friends were
> more popular than fore mentioned savior. He was murdered in 1980.
> 
> Just thought you'd like to know you might be better off claiming you're
> older than Homer, Ikhnaton, Solomon, Rome and some other stuff. Unlike
> Kunalpatel you're not immortal.

whaddyameani'mnotimmortal!??!!

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236347
Author: DG
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:38
14 lines
2234 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>> There once was a guy that claimed - for a lark - he and his friends were
>> more popular than fore mentioned savior. He was murdered in 1980.
>>
>> Just thought you'd like to know you might be better off claiming you're
>> older than Homer, Ikhnaton, Solomon, Rome and some other stuff. Unlike
>> Kunalpatel you're not immortal.
> 
> whaddyameani'mnotimmortal!??!!
> 
I'm sorry, I meant you're not an elephant.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236364
Author: ervaqre
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:42
13 lines
2146 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> hmm..I've seen many poo eating videos...but never one featuring hot and
>> horny necrophilia. if some day you change your mind, please record it
>> and show me the video.
>> 
> And here I was thinking that the whole donut hole/muffin thing was a bit
> iffy.

And what exactly is wrong with raping dead people? It's not very likely they'll find it a physically or 
emotionally painful experience. And it keeps rapists from harming little children.

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236365
Author: DG
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:22
35 lines
3396 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>>> hmm..I've seen many poo eating videos...but never one featuring hot and
>>> horny necrophilia. if some day you change your mind, please record it
>>> and show me the video.
>>>
>> And here I was thinking that the whole donut hole/muffin thing was a bit
>> iffy.
> 
> And what exactly is wrong with raping dead people? It's not very likely they'll find it a physically or 
> emotionally painful experience. And it keeps rapists from harming little children.
> 
Have you got consent from the deceased? Does it say in the last will and 
testament the body isn't donated to science but borderline rapists? Any 
being, human or otherwise, living or dead, should not only give consent 
but also be in a state where one could assume they're capable of giving 
consent as a normal adult would. Any situation where you have sex with 
any being that isn't fully capable of actively making such a decision is 
rape. And rape is a no-no.

On top of that there's also the power issue. Like an employee that fears 
saying no to the boss in fear of being fired. Or someone that is far 
older and able to manipulate the younger party.

It seems to me that you should be the one proving it is alright and not 
up to others to prove it's wrong. Say I steal something from you, 
without you ever finding out. Like taking 100 euros out of 300 from your 
pocket and you assuming you spent it or miscounted it. Then that doesn't 
cause physical or emotional pain. It doesn't make it right though.

Besides, you *know* little Timmy is going to walk in on you and he'll be 
traumatized for life. Best case scenario he'll tell you to stop 
reanimating his 100 year old granny because they tried and it didn't work.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236348
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:27
9 lines
1959 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> whaddyameani'mnotimmortal!??!!
>> 
> I'm sorry, I meant you're not an elephant.

Wohohohohohooh!!! THey cut my balls!!!! Kihihireheheheeheheh!!!

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236366
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:38
46 lines
4384 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> And what exactly is wrong with raping dead people? It's not very likely
>> they'll find it a physically or emotionally painful experience. And it
>> keeps rapists from harming little children.
>> 
> Have you got consent from the deceased? Does it say in the last will and
> testament the body isn't donated to science but borderline rapists? Any
> being, human or otherwise, living or dead, should not only give consent
> but also be in a state where one could assume they're capable of giving
> consent as a normal adult would. Any situation where you have sex with
> any being that isn't fully capable of actively making such a decision is
> rape. And rape is a no-no.

There is one fatal error in your wicked philosophy. Thou claimst that teh dead are teh capable of giving 
consent. Now hast thou evah seen a dead bloke of gal givin' fukcin' consent!? Uh!? Thou speakst of last 
wills and all teh mornin' shit, but teh night knows better, them gays consented whilst being alives, yet 
death enslaves all. Only teh Lord of Darkness transverses darkness and the gloomy world beyond. 
NEVER CONFUZE MORALS WITH TEH POLITICKSSS!!

> On top of that there's also the power issue. Like an employee that fears
> saying no to the boss in fear of being fired. Or someone that is far
> older and able to manipulate the younger party.

Dead people are mortal weaklings? Why be considerate to them?! Aren't they just mere empty shells for 
us immortals to use and abuse, to misuse and to breaks our necks on in the dark and finest of the night?

> It seems to me that you should be the one proving it is alright and not
> up to others to prove it's wrong. Say I steal something from you,
> without you ever finding out. Like taking 100 euros out of 300 from your
> pocket and you assuming you spent it or miscounted it. Then that doesn't
> cause physical or emotional pain. It doesn't make it right though.

The pockets of necrophilia are deeper and bloodier than miscounting, physical and emotional pain, my 
dire friend of the cold and silent snow. The Chinese might be tingling on their balls, the Arabs pedestrians 
might be screwing wonderful and splendid udders, the African might be shivering in the black, yet does 
not the Faust reascend them all, beyond the Iron Throne of absolute power and suffering?

> Besides, you *know* little Timmy is going to walk in on you and he'll be
> traumatized for life. Best case scenario he'll tell you to stop
> reanimating his 100 year old granny because they tried and it didn't
> work.

Tim Shafer best be working on teh new Grim Fandango!!!!!

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236349
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:56
9 lines
2021 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>> I'm sorry, I meant you're not an elephant.
> 
> Wohohohohohooh!!! THey cut my balls!!!! Kihihireheheheeheheh!!!
> 
Tickles, doesn't it?

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236367
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:01
53 lines
4621 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>> Have you got consent from the deceased? Does it say in the last will and
>> testament the body isn't donated to science but borderline rapists? Any
>> being, human or otherwise, living or dead, should not only give consent
>> but also be in a state where one could assume they're capable of giving
>> consent as a normal adult would. Any situation where you have sex with
>> any being that isn't fully capable of actively making such a decision is
>> rape. And rape is a no-no.
> 
> There is one fatal error in your wicked philosophy. Thou claimst that teh dead are teh capable of giving 
> consent. Now hast thou evah seen a dead bloke of gal givin' fukcin' consent!? Uh!? Thou speakst of last 
> wills and all teh mornin' shit, but teh night knows better, them gays consented whilst being alives, yet 
> death enslaves all. Only teh Lord of Darkness transverses darkness and the gloomy world beyond. 
> NEVER CONFUZE MORALS WITH TEH POLITICKSSS!!

So since you aren't able to procure consent, you aren't allowed to 
proceed on your desired path.

>> On top of that there's also the power issue. Like an employee that fears
>> saying no to the boss in fear of being fired. Or someone that is far
>> older and able to manipulate the younger party.
> 
> Dead people are mortal weaklings? Why be considerate to them?! Aren't they just mere empty shells for 
> us immortals to use and abuse, to misuse and to breaks our necks on in the dark and finest of the night?

You also run the risk of pissing off people that are still alive and 
quite willing to push your claims of immortality to the edge. They don't 
even have to be family members or mere friends of the shell.

>> It seems to me that you should be the one proving it is alright and not
>> up to others to prove it's wrong. Say I steal something from you,
>> without you ever finding out. Like taking 100 euros out of 300 from your
>> pocket and you assuming you spent it or miscounted it. Then that doesn't
>> cause physical or emotional pain. It doesn't make it right though.
> 
> The pockets of necrophilia are deeper and bloodier than miscounting, physical and emotional pain, my 
> dire friend of the cold and silent snow. The Chinese might be tingling on their balls, the Arabs pedestrians 
> might be screwing wonderful and splendid udders, the African might be shivering in the black, yet does 
> not the Faust reascend them all, beyond the Iron Throne of absolute power and suffering?

No.

>> Besides, you *know* little Timmy is going to walk in on you and he'll be
>> traumatized for life. Best case scenario he'll tell you to stop
>> reanimating his 100 year old granny because they tried and it didn't
>> work.
> 
> Tim Shafer best be working on teh new Grim Fandango!!!!!
> 
New and improved with extra necrophilia.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236350
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:12
9 lines
2071 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> Wohohohohohooh!!! THey cut my balls!!!! Kihihireheheheeheheh!!!
>> 
> Tickles, doesn't it?

actually...they relocated my ball nervous system to my hinter molars

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236368
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:18
45 lines
3867 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> There is one fatal error in your wicked philosophy. Thou claimst that
>> teh dead are teh capable of giving consent. Now hast thou evah seen a
>> dead bloke of gal givin' fukcin' consent!? Uh!? Thou speakst of last
>> wills and all teh mornin' shit, but teh night knows better, them gays
>> consented whilst being alives, yet death enslaves all. Only teh Lord of
>> Darkness transverses darkness and the gloomy world beyond. NEVER
>> CONFUZE MORALS WITH TEH POLITICKSSS!!
> 
> So since you aren't able to procure consent, you aren't allowed to
> proceed on your desired path.

and which of teh gay LoRdS will ever stoppeth mEh in mEh paTh of DAUARKNESSS?

>> Dead people are mortal weaklings? Why be considerate to them?! Aren't
>> they just mere empty shells for us immortals to use and abuse, to
>> misuse and to breaks our necks on in the dark and finest of the night?
> 
> You also run the risk of pissing off people that are still alive and
> quite willing to push your claims of immortality to the edge. They don't
> even have to be family members or mere friends of the shell.

In that case I shall simple and merely teach them a lesson on how to treat with pineapple in a bin, jocked 
fresh teeth in some kind of boy, or some kind of...oh mate...please stop teh bright light

>> The pockets of necrophilia are deeper and bloodier than miscounting,
>> physical and emotional pain, my dire friend of the cold and silent
>> snow. The Chinese might be tingling on their balls, the Arabs
>> pedestrians might be screwing wonderful and splendid udders, the
>> African might be shivering in the black, yet does not the Faust
>> reascend them all, beyond the Iron Throne of absolute power and
>> suffering?
> 
> No.

provide arguments then! yet shall stand the wicked DRY path through the moor

>> Tim Shafer best be working on teh new Grim Fandango!!!!!
>> 
> New and improved with extra necrophilia.

well, that wouldn't sell to the masses, or would it?

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236351
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:32
12 lines
2184 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>>> Wohohohohohooh!!! THey cut my balls!!!! Kihihireheheheeheheh!!!
>>>
>> Tickles, doesn't it?
> 
> actually...they relocated my ball nervous system to my hinter molars
> 
That would explain...
...nothing really...

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236369
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:37
42 lines
3543 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>> So since you aren't able to procure consent, you aren't allowed to
>> proceed on your desired path.
> 
> and which of teh gay LoRdS will ever stoppeth mEh in mEh paTh of DAUARKNESSS?

The Lord of the Room of Darkness. Although he might just have prodded 
you along.

>> You also run the risk of pissing off people that are still alive and
>> quite willing to push your claims of immortality to the edge. They don't
>> even have to be family members or mere friends of the shell.
> 
> In that case I shall simple and merely teach them a lesson on how to treat with pineapple in a bin, jocked 
> fresh teeth in some kind of boy, or some kind of...oh mate...please stop teh bright light

I'm not gonna stop that truck.

>>> The pockets of necrophilia are deeper and bloodier than miscounting,
>>> physical and emotional pain, my dire friend of the cold and silent
>>> snow. The Chinese might be tingling on their balls, the Arabs
>>> pedestrians might be screwing wonderful and splendid udders, the
>>> African might be shivering in the black, yet does not the Faust
>>> reascend them all, beyond the Iron Throne of absolute power and
>>> suffering?
>> No.
> 
> provide arguments then! yet shall stand the wicked DRY path through the moor

Because it's patented and we'd lose the lawsuit and the shirts off our 
backs.

>>> Tim Shafer best be working on teh new Grim Fandango!!!!!
>>>
>> New and improved with extra necrophilia.
> 
> well, that wouldn't sell to the masses, or would it?
> 
Sure it would. It's CARTOON necrophilia.

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236352
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:04
12 lines
2150 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> actually...they relocated my ball nervous system to my hinter molars
>> 
> That would explain...
> ...nothing really...

High Five!!!

*raises hand*

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236370
Author: ervaqre
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:09
22 lines
2583 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
> The Lord of the Room of Darkness. Although he might just have prodded
> you along.

Room? I always thought the Lord or Darkness lived in a hole in the ground?

> I'm not gonna stop that truck.

I understand. You're filming it all and want to sell the video to LucasArts so that they can include it in their 
next Star Wars movie, right? I hope I will get a share of the profits in that case!
 
> Because it's patented and we'd lose the lawsuit and the shirts off our
> backs.

I don't wear shirts on my back, so I have nothing to lose.

> Sure it would. It's CARTOON necrophilia.

Oh, that, I've seen that before. In Japan.

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236353
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:46
15 lines
2303 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>>> actually...they relocated my ball nervous system to my hinter molars
>>>
>> That would explain...
>> ...nothing really...
> 
> High Five!!!
> 
> *raises hand*
> 
Rather not. If you are right about what they put behind your hinter 
molars, who knows what they put between your fingers...

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236371
Author: DG
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:50
31 lines
2925 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>> The Lord of the Room of Darkness. Although he might just have prodded
>> you along.
> 
> Room? I always thought the Lord or Darkness lived in a hole in the ground?

That's another one. I'm talking about the one that rules the dark room.

>> I'm not gonna stop that truck.
> 
> I understand. You're filming it all and want to sell the video to LucasArts so that they can include it in their 
> next Star Wars movie, right? I hope I will get a share of the profits in that case!

Star Wars: The Truck Wars.

>> Because it's patented and we'd lose the lawsuit and the shirts off our
>> backs.
> 
> I don't wear shirts on my back, so I have nothing to lose.

They'll find something else to take of your hands then.

>> Sure it would. It's CARTOON necrophilia.
> 
> Oh, that, I've seen that before. In Japan.
> 

Like your extensive collection of Japanese necrophilia cartoons...

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236354
Author: ervaqre
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:42
12 lines
2327 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> High Five!!!
>> 
>> *raises hand*
>> 
> Rather not. If you are right about what they put behind your hinter
> molars, who knows what they put between your fingers...

I'm a clean man. I wash myself every day.

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236372
Author: ervaqre
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:44
31 lines
2970 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> Room? I always thought the Lord or Darkness lived in a hole in the
>> ground?
> 
> That's another one. I'm talking about the one that rules the dark room.

Ahh...where is he from? Nigeria? Venezuela?
 
>> I understand. You're filming it all and want to sell the video to
>> LucasArts so that they can include it in their next Star Wars movie,
>> right? I hope I will get a share of the profits in that case!
> 
> Star Wars: The Truck Wars.

That's quite a catchy title you got there. Maybe you can sell it to George Lucas for the release of Monkey 
Island 5.

>> I don't wear shirts on my back, so I have nothing to lose.
> 
> They'll find something else to take of your hands then.

I'd better chop off my hands then, eh?

>> Oh, that, I've seen that before. In Japan.
>> 
> Like your extensive collection of Japanese necrophilia cartoons...

Everybody needs something to cure loneliness.

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236355
Author: DG
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:16
10 lines
2350 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>> Rather not. If you are right about what they put behind your hinter
>> molars, who knows what they put between your fingers...
> 
> I'm a clean man. I wash myself every day.
> 
So you're a proper pirate?

-- 
Danny.
Re: You Better Recognise
#236356
Author: ervaqre
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:10
9 lines
2277 bytes
DG is a real pirate:
>> I'm a clean man. I wash myself every day.
>> 
> So you're a proper pirate?

Well, even a pirate has to adapt to modern society, right? Next thing I'll do is buy a television.

-- 
ervaqre, the lone usenet wanderer
Re: You Better Recognise
#236357
Author: DG
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:40
10 lines
2384 bytes
ervaqre schreef:
>> So you're a proper pirate?
> 
> Well, even a pirate has to adapt to modern society, right? Next thing I'll do is buy a television.
> 
Make sure it's 1080p, has at least 3 hdmi ports and has a LED backlight. 
Then invite Pixel and he'll go and live on your couch.

-- 
Danny.
Page 1 of 2 β€’ 83 total messages
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads