🚀 go-pugleaf

OK, D3 is an extension of D1 and it's just what Id wanted huh? How the hell
you can argue that when you compare what Q2 was to Q1 and what Q3 was and
still is to Q2 is beyond me. Id laid a giant egg, the game is a steaming
pile of dung and that's why it's being soundly trashed on boards from coast
to coast. There has never been a more highly anticipated and wildly hyped
title from a major developer that has sucked so bad as D3. While they were
screwing around with this game for years, other titles, such as Farcry and
Painkiller have shown us the future of the FPS and Id is sucking wind. How
the mighty have fallen...

"Blaedmon" <ass@hell.com> wrote in message
news:cf6qmt$2ri9$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
> I could go on about the amusing, yet completely purile, arguments
'against'
> you've made, but I think we'd all agree that'd be far too easy. Point made
> simple: do you think id would spend 6 years or whatever making a game the
> way they DIDNT intend it to be? No, of course not. Their end product IS
what
> they intended. Still want to whinge? Then you're an idiot.
> They didnt 'miss' any target. They hit it and blew the fucking thing up as
> far as logic goes.
> It isnt an updated DOOM? Yes..yes it is. Get glasses or an IQ at least a
> margin higher than room temperature.
> I'm not old enough to remember DOOM? Yes...yes I am. And besides, dont
make
> statements that make YOU sound like a dickhead. Thats hardly the aim of an
> insult. Read up on it. 'Insults for dickheads' is good I hear.
> They wont make a milestone in gaming history? Yes...yes they will. In
fact,
> they have - past tense.
> Putting it simpler - its a game in which you shoot things. Thats its core.
> If you go beyond that, it is no longer DOOM. Its merely an updated version
> of a past technology, in which it does NOT transgress from its base
> interactive fundamentals.
> In essence, I guess I can end this silly little discussion by simply
> saying - you're a dickhead. I think that just fits perfectly and is stated
> as eloquently as manners permit.
>
>
> "gorak" <nooo@nooo.it> wrote in message
> news:3vBRc.90055$OR2.4822858@news3.tin.it...
> >> Hey you Dickheads... stop whinging about the game being 'oh just
another
> >> fps' where u walk around corridors and nothing new happens. Are you
> >> stupid?
> >> Its called DOOM3 - maybe it has something to do with DOOM? Remember
that
> >> game? Did u expect to frolick around in large open plains while
> >> collecting
> >> magic pixie dust and bonus powerups? My God some people can be obtuse.
In
> >> DOOM all u did was shoot shit.
> >
> > Hey, in DOOM there was large open plains full of powerups!!! How old are
> > you?
> > I don't think that in Doom3 there should be open plains, but your
> > arguments are wrong.
> >
> >> Now lets see... DOOM3 is merely an updated
> >
> > Yes but the gameplay isn't UP TO DATE...it's years old, that's the
point.
> > Update a game don't means update only the graphics engine...
> > In fact they update the gameplay but it's just not meet the today
> > standards.
> > So it's looks like they tried...missing the target,  bit more than
another
> > id's
> > "new engine promotional game"
> >
> >> DOOM... so lets have a guess that its basically the same scenerio. Get
> >> it?
> >> Fucking freaks.
> >
> > I don't think you are old enough to remember the first doom.
> > Same scenerio don't means same repetitive gameplay.
> > Oh yes you can do it and make a good game with a massive commercial
> > success,
> > but you don't create a new milestone in game history (as we was hoping).
> >
> >
>
>