🚀 go-pugleaf

> I could go on about the amusing, yet completely purile, arguments 'against'
> you've made, but I think we'd all agree that'd be far too easy. Point made
> simple: do you think id would spend 6 years or whatever making a game the
> way they DIDNT intend it to be? No, of course not. Their end product IS what
> they intended. Still want to whinge? Then you're an idiot.

That's your agument? Well, with this logic duke nuke forever will be a "world changing
game"... Time don't determinate nothig. If you follow a wrong idea for 6 year
don't means you make it good.
In the real world people try to do things, some time it's comes good some time not.
The problem isn't what to do, but how to do.

> They didnt 'miss' any target. They hit it and blew the fucking thing up as
> far as logic goes.

If they hit the target, the target was wrong. But I don't think so, they trid to make
a scarry game and they done just a good job, but you can't build fear on repetitive action.
I'm not so freak, I'm realizing that every professional review is just saing the same...

> It isnt an updated DOOM? Yes..yes it is. Get glasses or an IQ at least a
> margin higher than room temperature.

Well, this is the level of conversation, ok, I have glasses and I miss some marks to become
informatic engineer couse my IT job keep me busy all the day, and you?
Also intolerance for the repetitive things is a good sign of intelligence.

> I'm not old enough to remember DOOM? Yes...yes I am.

How old are you? Really? It's a question not an insult.

> And besides, dont make statements that make YOU sound like a dickhead. Thats hardly
> the aim of an  insult. Read up on it. 'Insults for dickheads' is good I hear.
> They wont make a milestone in gaming history? Yes...yes they will. In fact,
> they have - past tense.
> Putting it simpler - its a game in which you shoot things. Thats its core.

It's the core of every FPS...

> If you go beyond that, it is no longer DOOM. Its merely an updated version
> of a past technology, in which it does NOT transgress from its base
> interactive fundamentals.

I keep asking your age couse it's looks like you really don't know doom. Doom was a
frenetic game based on very large rooms and large openspaces, where you kill dozen of monsters
per second.... If you think for a nanosecond you will realize that this game is complitly different
from the original, this is a fact. Stop saying "DOOM3 is DOOM" becouse have the same
ripetitive action. Doom 3 should be based on fear, and the original doom visual design wasn't
scarry at all (if you wasn't 8 years boy when you seen it).

THEY tried to change that core, they made an half-life intro (yes! they did) and a epistolary story
that most of people don't cure about, it's clear that they did something wrong.
You have to accept it and stop being a fanatic fan.

> In essence, I guess I can end this silly little discussion by simply
> saying - you're a dickhead. I think that just fits perfectly and is stated
> as eloquently as manners permit.

You are not able to think over your mind, this is the problem, probabily for you age, or your "mind age"
Lot of people like ripetitive things and idiot movie with massive fx... so, good for you, little boy.