Problem with Graphics in Diablo

Thread View: alt.games.diablo

3 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

3 total messages Started by rtho... Roge. Thompson Sun, 02 Mar 1997 00:00

#1827

Author: rtho... Roge. Thompson
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 00:00

20 lines
1082 bytes

Hello, 

	After trying the demo I thought the program was great. I went
out and purchased Diablo, after removing the shareware version and
installed the full version, the graphic quality is different. The
shareware version looked great! after installing the full version the
graphics look like 256 color mode! the video card is an ATI Mach64.
anybody got any clues as to why the full version does not have the
save quality as the shareware version?


Also: I would like to use it on my laptop, but the graphics looks like
it is all sheared, the program reports that it is directx compatable,
and I have tried several other drivers, but no luck. The laptop is a
NEC Versa 4230.


Roger J.Thompson
rtho...@nb.sympatico.ca

Re: Problem with Graphics in Diablo

#1828

Author: Mikael Kasurinen
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00

21 lines
1311 bytes



Roge. Thompson <rtho...@nb.sympatico.ca> wrote in article
<3319f821...@allnews.nb.sympatico.ca>...
> Hello, 
> 
> 	After trying the demo I thought the program was great. I went
> out and purchased Diablo, after removing the shareware version and
> installed the full version, the graphic quality is different. The
> shareware version looked great! after installing the full version the
> graphics look like 256 color mode! the video card is an ATI Mach64.
> anybody got any clues as to why the full version does not have the
> save quality as the shareware version?

Well...that's very strange, coz i didn't have any problems like
that. Neither did my friend who had same graphs-card like u
do.

Play around with W95:s graphic-settings, and hey, have u checked
that the directX-driver works properly and that it is version 3.

Re: Problem with Graphics in Diablo

#1829

Author: Dave McDougall
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 00:00

37 lines
1779 bytes

In article <01bc2899$3014ad20$LocalHost@default>, Mikael Kasurinen
<mi...@sci.fi> writes
>
>
>Roge. Thompson <rtho...@nb.sympatico.ca> wrote in article
><3319f821...@allnews.nb.sympatico.ca>...
>> Hello, 
>> 
>>      After trying the demo I thought the program was great. I went
>> out and purchased Diablo, after removing the shareware version and
>> installed the full version, the graphic quality is different. The
>> shareware version looked great! after installing the full version the
>> graphics look like 256 color mode! the video card is an ATI Mach64.
>> anybody got any clues as to why the full version does not have the
>> save quality as the shareware version?
>
>Well...that's very strange, coz i didn't have any problems like
>that. Neither did my friend who had same graphs-card like u
>do.
>
>Play around with W95:s graphic-settings, and hey, have u checked
>that the directX-driver works properly and that it is version 3.

I have an ATI Mach 64 and I've never had any problems with the graphics
in Diablo.

I haven't noticed any difference in the quality of the graphics between
the shareware version and the actual released game either.

Dave
-- 

        "Knowing the lions' preference for red meat, the
                spamalopes remained calm but wary."

Dave McDougall

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads