🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <01bc2899$3014ad20$LocalHost@default>, Mikael Kasurinen
<mi...@sci.fi> writes
>
>
>Roge. Thompson <rtho...@nb.sympatico.ca> wrote in article
><3319f821...@allnews.nb.sympatico.ca>...
>> Hello, 
>> 
>>      After trying the demo I thought the program was great. I went
>> out and purchased Diablo, after removing the shareware version and
>> installed the full version, the graphic quality is different. The
>> shareware version looked great! after installing the full version the
>> graphics look like 256 color mode! the video card is an ATI Mach64.
>> anybody got any clues as to why the full version does not have the
>> save quality as the shareware version?
>
>Well...that's very strange, coz i didn't have any problems like
>that. Neither did my friend who had same graphs-card like u
>do.
>
>Play around with W95:s graphic-settings, and hey, have u checked
>that the directX-driver works properly and that it is version 3.

I have an ATI Mach 64 and I've never had any problems with the graphics
in Diablo.

I haven't noticed any difference in the quality of the graphics between
the shareware version and the actual released game either.

Dave
-- 

        "Knowing the lions' preference for red meat, the
                spamalopes remained calm but wary."

Dave McDougall