🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.diablo
Article #302778

Re: Spell caster items--proposed rune words

#302778
From: Tom Flanigan PGNH
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 22:47
42 lines
2944 bytes

Gizmoduck wrote:

> powerful? yeah ok firewall is powerful...except when the enemy is fire
> immune, and 4000 dmg at what lvl is that? 25? the highest i have any
> spell is 12 (thunderstorm) and i take forever to kill anything in a
> 8player nm game...but generally the sorcs aren't that powerful...
>
>

I would not describe my sorc build as "uber" but merely powerful (she's designed
more to be unkillable than to wreck the kind of elemental fury that some sorcs
can), and I have yet to see very many characters (aside from other sorcs) in any
game that I've been in that I would consider more effective than my sorc (this
is in A5 Hell).

As I see it, sorcs have the advantage of not being _too_ equipment reliant. As
such, they're better right now when few melee classes have all that great
equipment.

The other day I saw a barbarian that absolutely ruled, but he had the skill and
the equipment. He had most of immortal king's set, except the armor and the belt
(I don't know what he was using for the belt, but he was using naj's light plate
for armor). He used a lot of ww, and a lot of berserk. When we partied together,
I pulled my weight, but I would say he did the majority of the killing. It was
enough to make me consider scraping my frenzy barb and instead go with berserk
(berserk rolls right past the -50% phsyical damage penalty on Hell... it really
is very powerful now). He also had an awe inspiring battle orders (although he
completely ignored the other warcries, perhaps for simplicities sake).


--


---------------
Tom Flanigan

"It is necessary for the welfare of society that genius should be
privileged to utter sedition, to blaspheme, to outrage good taste, to
corrupt the youthful mind, and generally to scandalize one's uncles."
                -- George Bernard Shaw
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3B48E2EB.A9C9A3D8@home.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!out.nntp.be!propagator-dallas!news-in-dallas.newsfeeds.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.md.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <3af9848e.0107081118.69254f49@posting.google.com> <KE227.95738$2W4.15032249@news02.optonline.net> <u9ehkt4or54sfom7sk122seb6vsoa4hcf8@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!out.nntp.be!propagator-dallas!news-in-dallas.newsfeeds.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.md.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3B48E2EB.A9C9A3D8@home.com>
From: "Tom Flanigan (PGNH)" <tomfl...@home.com>
Reply-To: tomfl...@home.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.games.diablo
Subject: Re: Spell caster items--proposed rune words
References: <3af9848e.0107081118.69254f49@posting.google.com> <KE227.95738$2W4.15032249@news02.optonline.net> <u9ehkt4or54sfom7sk122seb6vsoa4hcf8@4ax.com>
Lines: 44
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 22:47:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.3.4.60
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
X-Trace: news1.rdc1.md.home.com 994632427 24.3.4.60 (Sun, 08 Jul 2001 15:47:07 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 15:47:07 PDT
Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit