Article View: alt.games.diablo
Article #302779Re: Spell caster items--proposed rune words
From: Wch... BillChin
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 03:50
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 03:50
36 lines
2731 bytes
2731 bytes
+1 to fire damage would be a like a character level 5 mod. At that point in the game a sorceress would be very happy to have it. Maybe scale it up one point per five levels, so +10 for character level 50. No, not a huge big deal, but nice on some spells. Like having a poison charm that adds damage, not a big deal, but nice to have. The vast majority of the players play fairly low level characters. I'd guess that only about 10% of the people that own the game, have the 70th level super characters doing 4000 damage per melee hit, or per spell. What I am saying is that there are so few useful mods for sorceresses, and so, so many for the combat classes. Ok, so tone down the damage on spells a bit, they just upgraded the damage for version 1.08e, and put some useful items in. Who wants to see another staff with +1 to 20 lightning damage when you swing it? Or a wand, or an orb? Or another spell caster item with deadly strike or some other useless mod that just makes it worth more money, so other people run to pick it up. A staff with something like +2 to lightning damage on spells would be far more useful and make the game more interesting for the players. The way I see it is, by adding these mods, game balance would be about the same (it is always changing anyway), and the fun factor would be higher. - Bill > Considering just how obscenely powerful the sorcs got in the xpack, the last > thing they need is a way to do even more damage. And really, +1 to fire > damage? When firewall for instance can do 4,000 damage a second, +1 more > isn't even a drop in the bucket. Necros and perhaps elemental druids can use > something of a boost, but it would be rather hard to boost them without also > boosting the sorc. Most people now are calling for nerfs to the sorc(I > personally don't agree with them, but then again I disagree with the very > concept of nerfing), not a way to make them even more powerful.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3af9848e.0107081950.50672fa@posting.google.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3af9848e.0107081118.69254f49@posting.google.com> <KE227.95738$2W4.15032249@news02.optonline.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: Wch...@hotmail.com (BillChin) Newsgroups: alt.games.diablo Subject: Re: Spell caster items--proposed rune words Date: 8 Jul 2001 20:50:27 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 36 Message-ID: <3af9848e.0107081950.50672fa@posting.google.com> References: <3af9848e.0107081118.69254f49@posting.google.com> <KE227.95738$2W4.15032249@news02.optonline.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.210.123.74 X-Trace: posting.google.com 994650627 11712 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2001 03:50:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-...@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jul 2001 03:50:27 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit