🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #907

Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C

#907
From: shis... Who Dragon
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00
17 lines
1070 bytes
ez01...@bullwinkle.ucdavis.edu (Paul Lung) wrote:
>I find C&C a much better game design because there are different tactics
>if you play different sides. For WCII, we have the exact same units on
>both sides, so there really is no difference which side you play.

I like both. In C&C You have different units for the two sides (NOD, &
GDI of course), and in Warcraft there are units based the same way,
but they are different in design, power, etc.
I like Both games though


..___Who Dragon___..
.     -=UDIC=-
.Keep Ultima Pure!
.Leave the 3d for UW!
.-Ultima Purity League
.......................
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4kjtjj$4up@thor.atcon.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: shis...@MAIL.ATCON.COM (Who Dragon)
Subject: Re: Warcraft II  vs. C&C
Date: 1996/04/11
Message-ID: <4kjtjj$4up@thor.atcon.com>
X-Deja-AN: 146990052
references: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu>
organization: SD Technologies
reply-to: shis...@atcon.com
newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command.and.conquer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit