Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #907Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C
From: shis... Who Dragon
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00
17 lines
1070 bytes
1070 bytes
ez01...@bullwinkle.ucdavis.edu (Paul Lung) wrote: >I find C&C a much better game design because there are different tactics >if you play different sides. For WCII, we have the exact same units on >both sides, so there really is no difference which side you play. I like both. In C&C You have different units for the two sides (NOD, & GDI of course), and in Warcraft there are units based the same way, but they are different in design, power, etc. I like Both games though ..___Who Dragon___.. . -=UDIC=- .Keep Ultima Pure! .Leave the 3d for UW! .-Ultima Purity League .......................
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4kjtjj$4up@thor.atcon.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: shis...@MAIL.ATCON.COM (Who Dragon) Subject: Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C Date: 1996/04/11 Message-ID: <4kjtjj$4up@thor.atcon.com> X-Deja-AN: 146990052 references: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu> organization: SD Technologies reply-to: shis...@atcon.com newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command.and.conquer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit