Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C

Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer

Article #906

Back to alt.games.command.and.conquer Previous Next

#906

From: ri... Richard Vd Weijden
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 00:00

19 lines
1361 bytes

>>Nathan Palovcik (am...@elycion.geology.ualberta.ca) wrote:
>>: I will give C&C high marks for it's humour, the music & SFX, IMHO better than 
>>: Warcraft.  'Daboo!' just can't measure up against blood-curdling death 
>>: screams. ;>
>>I find C&C a much better game design because there are different tactics
>>if you play different sides. For WCII, we have the exact same units on
>>both sides, so there really is no difference which side you play.
>>-- 
>I agree!  C & C has lots of variation, and is a great game overall.  I
>wished C & C had SVGA graphics though, but still their cut scenes were
>much better then WC II.  
>Warcraft II lacks something.  It's enioyable to play, but I felt in
>the game with C & C, and yet I don't feel that way with WC II.  The
>sides are too similar....:/

I think the Graphics of WCII are to Childies C&C have more & Better
Action Looks... 

Bye..

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4l3afj$9d2@neptunus.pi.net>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu> <4kfa72$vuc@aegis.nitco.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: ri...@pi.net (Richard Vd Weijden)
Subject: Re: Warcraft II  vs. C&C
Date: 1996/04/17
Message-ID: <4l3afj$9d2@neptunus.pi.net>
X-Deja-AN: 150408932
references: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu> <4kfa72$vuc@aegis.nitco.com>
organization: Planet Internet
newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command.and.conquer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message