🚀 go-pugleaf

Burghy <lu...@BLAhkstar.com> wrote:

>Arthur Tse wrote:

>> Oh, look, look at all the reviews around, true the some elements in the
>> game was not quite so good but I have to say it is still the best
>> strategy game around, and could you please specify what you do not like
>> and why you felt you did not get the value you expected.
>> 
>> Thanks

>Ur welcome.  C&C had a stone-paper-scissors balance.  RA doesn't,
>because the infantry-tank-anti infantry is upset, because the tanks are
>good against everything.  Therefore there is no use for anti-infantry
>which is vulnerable to tanks (e.g. ranger), and infantry is ineffective
>(except sometimes bazookas.)

True. Also, the soviets have the tesla coil, wich puts the allies to
further disadvantage, since they are not big tank users. The allies
should have gotten this to help counter soviet tanks. Also, the
soviets can beat the allies ships with submarines easily, as long as
you have enough of them.
The Counterstrike add on pack will supposedly work out some of these
imbalances, but Westwood is not revealing much about it.
*******************************************************************
pgp user id Marco S. Chiono <chia...@dgt.shiny.it>   
PGP encrypted messages welcome for public key email any keyserver                    
remove "antispam" to reply by e-mail                        
******************************************************************