Re: RA PATCH NEWS [Re: RA update (fwd)]

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq

Article #23074

Back to alt.games.command-n-conq Previous Next

#23074

From: Burghy
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00

15 lines
1219 bytes

Arthur Tse wrote:

> Oh, look, look at all the reviews around, true the some elements in the
> game was not quite so good but I have to say it is still the best
> strategy game around, and could you please specify what you do not like
> and why you felt you did not get the value you expected.
> 
> Thanks

Ur welcome.  C&C had a stone-paper-scissors balance.  RA doesn't,
because the infantry-tank-anti infantry is upset, because the tanks are
good against everything.  Therefore there is no use for anti-infantry
which is vulnerable to tanks (e.g. ranger), and infantry is ineffective
(except sometimes bazookas.)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3332123B.39E2@BLAhkstar.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<Pine.OSF.3.96.970312140351.3953E-100000@curly.cc.utexas.edu> <01bc2f42$471c1120$679edaa5@marka> <332d3a6d.5683380@news.powerup.com.au> <332E53EC.59C9@wave.co.nz>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: Burghy <lu...@BLAhkstar.com>
Subject: Re: RA PATCH NEWS [Re: RA update (fwd)]
Date: 1997/03/20
Message-ID: <3332123B.39E2@BLAhkstar.com>
X-Deja-AN: 227045520
References: <Pine.OSF.3.96.970312140351.3953E-100000@curly.cc.utexas.edu> <01bc2f42$471c1120$679edaa5@marka> <332d3a6d.5683380@news.powerup.com.au> <332E53EC.59C9@wave.co.nz>
Organization: Burghy Ltd.
Reply-To: lu...@BLAhkstar.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.redalert,alt.games.command-n-conq
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message