🚀 go-pugleaf

>s950...@minyos.its.rmit.EDU.AU (Justin Cain Brymer) wrote:

>Stephen G. Johnson (sjoh...@accessone.com) wrote:
>: t...@cs.tulane.edu (Chu Tan) wrote:

>: >g...@spirit.com.au (Gav) wrote:
>: >> I would like to get an idea on the popularity of harvester hunting, so
>: >> vote for whether you are FOR or AGAINST harvester killing as a tactic
>: >> to beat your opponent. Leave your thoughts if you wish.

>: >I would rather wait for the harvester to return to the base and
>: >destroy them altogether. Save time. Kill two birds with one stone.
>: >When against the computer, the harvester will stop moving when the
>: >refinery is destroyed, wasted alot of time searching for the invisible
>: >harvester.

>: I find that if the opportunity presents itself, you should do as much
>: economic damage to your opponent as possible.  This lessens his/her
>: chance to regroup and refinance

>nope, i want a fun game, no money, no troups = no fun
>let harvesters live and the games are always more fun

I think the harvesters should be left alone. They arent hurting
anyone. big friendly roamers. If you want to attack something, go play
with a mammoth tank.