Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq
Article #23118Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ??
From: wf... Bill
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 00:00
9 lines
660 bytes
660 bytes
On 12 Mar 1997 14:58:04 GMT, "Fuji Sartono" <sar...@prica.org> wrote: >Hi . .. > >I wanna purchase one of these but which one is better ? Go with C&C. Better strategy play and has weapons of mass destruction: ion cannon and nukes.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<332c3a29.11678785@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: wf...@juno.com (Bill) Subject: Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ?? Date: 1997/03/16 Message-ID: <332c3a29.11678785@netnews2.worldnet.att.net> X-Deja-AN: 225834085 References: <01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net> Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services Newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit