Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ??

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq

Article #23119

Back to alt.games.command-n-conq Previous Next

#23119

From: rup... Richard just call me Rich...
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 00:00

14 lines
992 bytes

In article <332c3a29...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>,
	wf...@juno.com (Bill) writes:
>On 12 Mar 1997 14:58:04 GMT, "Fuji Sartono" <sar...@prica.org> wrote:
>
>>Hi . .. 
>>
>>I wanna purchase one of these but which one is better ?
>
>Go with C&C.  Better strategy play and has weapons of mass
>destruction:  ion cannon and nukes.
>
RA has weapons of mass destruction too. (both sides have nukes)
 I agree though buy C&C it much better

Technical Details

Message-ID: <858640666.347768@kaukau.mcs.vuw.ac.nz>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: rup...@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Richard \"just call me Richard\" Upton)
Subject: Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ??
Date: 1997/03/17
Message-ID: <858640666.347768@kaukau.mcs.vuw.ac.nz>
X-Deja-AN: 226417035
Cache-Post-Path: kaukau.mcs.vuw.ac.nz!unk...@embassy.mcs.vuw.ac.nz
References: <01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net>
Organization: School of Mathematical and Computing Sciences, VUW
Newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message