🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq
Article #23030

Re: RA vs. Warcraft 2 [Was Re: RA update (fwd)]

#23030
From: dan... Boylard
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 00:00
60 lines
3156 bytes
On 9 Apr 1997 22:54:28 GMT, "Thomas M. Turner" <Thomas...@uni.edu>
wrote:

>Ok, anyone out there that thinks there is *more* strategy in Red Alert than
>in Warcraft 2, bring it on...  

OK, whatever u say

>Gee, let's see, I'll take the ... uh,
>Soviets and tank rush your shit - oh boy, I won, cool, that really took a
>lot of thought.
>

>A person shouldn't *have* to edit a .INI file and *change the game* to make
>it worth playing...
>

I have never edited the rules and I still enjoy RA a lot more than war
2

>Do you know how to stop someone from taking peons in Warcraft 2 that are
>made invisible and flame shielded from destroying all your shit, you paid
>10 more to build? What do you do when someone takes a pack of Mages and
>starts a blizzard on your camp, and then uses a chain of invisible spells
>so that you can't even kill the little bastard?  Oh, and when someone
>starts using guerrilla warfare with mages and the polymorph spell...fun. 
>And of course, there's the matter of having to drill for oil, which is a
>*strategic* feature that you have to think about if you plan on building a
>navy, which you don't have comparable in Red Alert.
>

It's also very annoying. The magic only comes into play if you are too
slow to finish your opponent off..

>I guess if you think Warcraft 2 is dull in multiplayer mode, you just
>haven't figured out how to play it yet...I'm sure I could kick your ass in
>a few minutes.
>

Doesn't that sort of defeat the point of your argument that war2 is
more strategic than RA if you are just gonna rush your opponent and
finish them in a few minutes?

>I would argue that multiplayer mode in Warcraft 2 is more *strategic* than
>Red Alert.  It's the single player missions that are superior for Red
>Alert.  Oh, and you can actually save a multiplayer game in Warcraft 2...
>that's 2.99 strikes against Westwood right there!
>

Let me see... the last time i played someone in multiplayer i could
save the game, just buy Counterstrike. If you are too cheap/lazy to go
out and but it just wait for the patch to be put on the web site..
Virtual Ted has said it will be put there soon...


---
Boylard
dan...@white.prestel.co.uk
The Red Alert Map Library <http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/8191/ra.htm>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <334cd875.1665310@news.prestel.co.uk>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <Pine.OSF.3.96.970312140351.3953E-100000@curly.cc.utexas.edu> <01bc2f42$471c1120$679edaa5@marka> <332d3a6d.5683380@news.powerup.com.au> <5gfv2d$2tq@tofu.alt.net> <3335b898.2385628@news.inet.it> <01bc37a5$3fed9e80$936ab4cc@EricAdams> <33377A4E.4C84@tpgi.com.au> <NEWTNews.859291806.29992.kkopp@neo.lrun.com> <01bc3fc2$f1087580$561103c3@worldnet.fr.sct.fr> <33449d9f.41079824@news.snni.com> <01bc0264$6ad28d20$7736e6ce@first1.acc-net> <01bc4538$66f74ee0$9264a186@thomas.turner>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: dan...@white.prestel.co.uk (Boylard)
Subject: Re: RA vs. Warcraft 2 [Was Re: RA update (fwd)]
Date: 1997/04/11
Message-ID: <334cd875.1665310@news.prestel.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 232286448
References: <Pine.OSF.3.96.970312140351.3953E-100000@curly.cc.utexas.edu> <01bc2f42$471c1120$679edaa5@marka> <332d3a6d.5683380@news.powerup.com.au> <5gfv2d$2tq@tofu.alt.net> <3335b898.2385628@news.inet.it> <01bc37a5$3fed9e80$936ab4cc@EricAdams>  <33377A4E.4C84@tpgi.com.au> <NEWTNews.859291806.29992.kkopp@neo.lrun.com> <01bc3fc2$f1087580$561103c3@worldnet.fr.sct.fr> <33449d9f.41079824@news.snni.com> <01bc0264$6ad28d20$7736e6ce@first1.acc-net> <01bc4538$66f74ee0$9264a186@thomas.turner>
Organization: [not set]
Newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit