🚀 go-pugleaf

Thomas M. Turner wrote:
> 
> Ok, anyone out there that thinks there is *more* strategy in Red Alert than
> in Warcraft 2, bring it on...  Gee, let's see, I'll take the ... uh,
> Soviets and tank rush your shit - oh boy, I won, cool, that really took a
> lot of thought.
> 
> A person shouldn't *have* to edit a .INI file and *change the game* to make
> it worth playing...
> 
> Do you know how to stop someone from taking peons in Warcraft 2 that are
> made invisible and flame shielded from destroying all your shit, you paid
> 10 more to build? What do you do when someone takes a pack of Mages and
> starts a blizzard on your camp, and then uses a chain of invisible spells
> so that you can't even kill the little bastard?  Oh, and when someone
> starts using guerrilla warfare with mages and the polymorph spell...fun.
> And of course, there's the matter of having to drill for oil, which is a
> *strategic* feature that you have to think about if you plan on building a
> navy, which you don't have comparable in Red Alert.
> 
> I guess if you think Warcraft 2 is dull in multiplayer mode, you just
> haven't figured out how to play it yet...I'm sure I could kick your ass in
> a few minutes.
> 
> I would argue that multiplayer mode in Warcraft 2 is more *strategic* than
> Red Alert.  It's the single player missions that are superior for Red
> Alert.  Oh, and you can actually save a multiplayer game in Warcraft 2...
> that's 2.99 strikes against Westwood right there!
> 
> - T.T.

 Are u stupid ???? if u are building mages and upgrading them too but
the other only build grunts in the beginning or goes for the ogres u
never have a chance against it becuz u have less ogres/grunts. so stop
saying the bullshit about war2 more tactics, its just a rush game too...
the only thing that can stop rushes is teh map its played on , dumbass.
and about teh better game : RA sux, War2 sux more.
C&C is the best game ever!

Gizmo