🚀 go-pugleaf

Mr. Insight wrote:
> 
> Anonymous wrote:
> >
> > Anonymous would like to make two points at this time:
> >
> > 1.  The males who defend female management and equality are the
> > ones who are the third, fourth and fifth-rate males who will go
> > right down to the mat fighting to keep the current vile scheme
> > of things in place and who are holding jobs and earning money
> > which they never could command in the absence of females' keeping
> > them on as cronies.
> >
> > 2.  If females are such wonderful workers and if female
> > management is such a wonderful thing, then how come females
> > couldn't make it on their own merit in the absence of equal
> > employment opportunity laws?  It's been said that smart
> > employers don't discriminate and that smart employers hire
> > the best qualified.  Why aren't smart employers smart in the
> > absence of equal employment opportunity laws?  Why is it
> > that countries that have lagged behind us in passing such
> > laws are also lagging behind us with the sagging of their
> > economies and societies (most notably, Japan)?
> 
> I regard the use of anonymous posts, such as this, as an act of
> incredible cowardice.  If one surveys the most venomous messages, they
> seem to come primarily from unidentified contributors.
> 
> Dr. Martine RoBards

And the stupidist ones!  I know I would be embarassed if I was a man
with self-esteem was so low as to blame all my failures on women!