🚀 go-pugleaf

Anonymous wrote:
> 
> Anonymous would like to make two points at this time:
> 
> 1.  The males who defend female management and equality are the
> ones who are the third, fourth and fifth-rate males who will go
> right down to the mat fighting to keep the current vile scheme
> of things in place and who are holding jobs and earning money
> which they never could command in the absence of females' keeping
> them on as cronies.
> 
> 2.  If females are such wonderful workers and if female
> management is such a wonderful thing, then how come females
> couldn't make it on their own merit in the absence of equal
> employment opportunity laws?  It's been said that smart
> employers don't discriminate and that smart employers hire
> the best qualified.  Why aren't smart employers smart in the
> absence of equal employment opportunity laws?  Why is it
> that countries that have lagged behind us in passing such
> laws are also lagging behind us with the sagging of their
> economies and societies (most notably, Japan)?


I regard the use of anonymous posts, such as this, as an act of
incredible cowardice.  If one surveys the most venomous messages, they
seem to come primarily from unidentified contributors.

Dr. Martine RoBards