🚀 go-pugleaf

LilChica <yc...@itol.com> wrote:

>Mr. Insight wrote:
>> 
>> Anonymous wrote:
>> >
>> > Anonymous would like to make two points at this time:
>> >
>> > 1.  The males who defend female management and equality are the
>> > ones who are the third, fourth and fifth-rate males who will go
>> > right down to the mat fighting to keep the current vile scheme
>> > of things in place and who are holding jobs and earning money
>> > which they never could command in the absence of females' keeping
>> > them on as cronies.
>> >
>> > 2.  If females are such wonderful workers and if female
>> > management is such a wonderful thing, then how come females
>> > couldn't make it on their own merit in the absence of equal
>> > employment opportunity laws?  It's been said that smart
>> > employers don't discriminate and that smart employers hire
>> > the best qualified.  Why aren't smart employers smart in the
>> > absence of equal employment opportunity laws?  Why is it
>> > that countries that have lagged behind us in passing such
>> > laws are also lagging behind us with the sagging of their
>> > economies and societies (most notably, Japan)?
>> 
>> I regard the use of anonymous posts, such as this, as an act of
>> incredible cowardice.  If one surveys the most venomous messages,
they
>> seem to come primarily from unidentified contributors.
>> 
>> Dr. Martine RoBards

>And the stupidist ones!  I know I would be embarassed if I was a man
>with self-esteem was so low as to blame all my failures on women!

I didn't see that guy blame any of his falures on anyone.
Paul N. Johnson, Mpls, Mn.
pjoh...@onrampinc.net