🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <199702250209...@nym.alias.net>,
  nob...@nowhere.no.no.net (Anonymous) wrote:
> 
> In article <3311b109...@news.mindspring.com>, Hans Derycke wrote:
> 
> > My pet theory is that Anonymous has been fired by a female supervisor
> > and replaced by a far more intelligent, competent and mature female
> > colleague.
> > 
> > But that's just me.
> 
> I'll be frank and tell it like it is.  When I work for a man, he
> wants me to stay.  When I work for a woman, she wants me to leave
> (that is, after she is confident that she has gotten as much as
> she needs out of me).  I have gotten high praise from female
> superiors, especially when being escorted out!  Because of this
> manipulative praise, I am ashamed to say that it took me years to
> figure things out!  BTW, I have observed female managers and
> executives elevate the dregs of the earth to be their closet
> cronies, this being the case in every corporate department!
> 
> Do not blame my attitude.  I am very careful at work.  I am
> more PC than most, as a matter of fact!
> 
> The Treatise on the Downward Wage Equalizing Effects
> of Equal Employment Opportunity is available at:
> http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3982/
> 
> "Government enforced wage equalization will work only
> in the downward direction" - despite any initial
> appearance to the contrary!  And the most shocking
> thing of all is that the least preferred worker does
> not even have to be awarded a job for many phenomena
> to occur.