🚀 go-pugleaf

Two reposts of past posts follow for those of you whose news
server no longer carries them.


     *-*-* First repost starts here -*-*-*


In article <3311b109...@news.mindspring.com>, Hans Derycke wrote:


> My pet theory is that Anonymous has been fired by a female supervisor
> and replaced by a far more intelligent, competent and mature female
> colleague.
>
> But that's just me.


I'll be frank and tell it like it is.  When I work for a man, he
wants me to stay.  When I work for a woman, she wants me to leave
(that is, after she is confident that she has gotten as much as
she needs out of me).  I have gotten high praise from female
superiors, especially when being escorted out!  Because of this
manipulative praise, I am ashamed to say that it took me years to
figure things out!  BTW, I have observed female managers and
executives elevate the dregs of the earth to be their closet
cronies, this being the case in every corporate department!

Do not blame my attitude.  I am very careful at work.  I am
more PC than most, as a matter of fact!

The Treatise on the Downward Wage Equalizing Effects
of Equal Employment Opportunity is available at:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3982/

"Government enforced wage equalization will work only
in the downward direction" - despite any initial
appearance to the contrary!  And the most shocking
thing of all is that the least preferred worker does
not even have to be awarded a job for many phenomena
to occur.

     *-*-* First repost ends here -*-*-*


     *-*-* Second repost starts here -*-*-*


In article <5etkh1$g...@NNTP.MsState.Edu>, bi...@cast.msstate.edu
(Billy Chambless) wrote:


> |> figure things out!  BTW, I have observed female managers and
> |> executives elevate the dregs of the earth to be their closet
> |> cronies, this being the case in every corporate department!
>
> Oh, yeah, and no male managers ever do *that*!


Your analysis is not complete.  If there were no government
enforced equality, then there would be no male managers who would
have female subordinates (with the exception of secretaries and
other worker bees).  So now you have politically correct and
brain-dead male managers who ascend to their positions; they come
with a willingness to have female subordinates; but they also come
with certain undesirable characteristics and characters!

Another explanation for what you point out is that the nature of
government enforced equality is such that everyone in the game
of life is moving towards a multiway tie for last place.  Under
such circumstances, would you expect to see anything but the
dregs being elevated?

The Treatise on the Downward Wage Equalizing Effects
of Equal Employment Opportunity is available at:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3982/

"Government enforced wage equalization will work only
in the downward direction" - despite any initial
appearance to the contrary!  And the most shocking
thing of all is that the least preferred worker does
not even have to be awarded a job for many phenomena
to occur.

     *-*-* Second repost ends here -*-*-*