🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <5etkh1$g...@NNTP.MsState.Edu>, bi...@cast.msstate.edu
(Billy Chambless) wrote:

 
> |> figure things out!  BTW, I have observed female managers and
> |> executives elevate the dregs of the earth to be their closet
> |> cronies, this being the case in every corporate department!
> 
> Oh, yeah, and no male managers ever do *that*!


Your analysis is not complete.  If there were no government
enforced equality, then there would be no male managers who would
have female subordinates (with the exception of secretaries and
other worker bees).  So now you have politically correct and
brain-dead male managers who ascend to their positions; they come
with a willingness to have female subordinates; but they also come
with certain undesirable characteristics and characters!

Another explanation for what you point out is that the nature of
government enforced equality is such that everyone in the game
of life is moving towards a multiway tie for last place.  Under
such circumstances, would you expect to see anything but the 
dregs being elevated?

The Treatise on the Downward Wage Equalizing Effects
of Equal Employment Opportunity is available at:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3982/
 
"Government enforced wage equalization will work only
in the downward direction" - despite any initial
appearance to the contrary!  And the most shocking
thing of all is that the least preferred worker does
not even have to be awarded a job for many phenomena
to occur.