Article View: pl.internet.polip
Article #95148Re: Po debacie o jakości - UKE - wolne wnioski
From: Smok Eustachy
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 09:23
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 09:23
7 lines
1325 bytes
1325 bytes
Dnia Sat, 21 May 2011 09:11:48 +0000, wm napisał(a): /../ > > Jeśli wolno działa bo operator tnie to gostek przy podpisywaniu umowy > powinien zwrócić uwagę by było w nim stwierdzenie w stylu "bez blokad i > limitów" A jeśli nie tnie?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ir80ak$emf$5@news.onet.pl>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.rmf.pl!agh.edu.pl!news.agh.edu.pl!news.onet.pl!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<iquv48$5os$1@inews.gazeta.pl> <2050d62b-b06c-4658-a2b4-b9361e1cf188@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <ir5ip0$p5p$1@inews.gazeta.pl> <ir6m6m$e01$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <ir6rba$pvl$1@opal.futuro.pl> <ir6sna$ug5$1@news.onet.pl> <ir7r47$hvf$2@opal.futuro.pl> <ir7ui1$emf$2@news.onet.pl> <ir7vkk$vur$1@opal.futuro.pl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.rmf.pl!agh.edu.pl!news.agh.edu.pl!news.onet.pl!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Smok Eustachy <smok.eustachy@wurg.pl> Newsgroups: pl.internet.polip Subject: Re: Po debacie o jakości - UKE - wolne wnioski Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 09:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Organization: http://onet.pl Lines: 7 Message-ID: <ir80ak$emf$5@news.onet.pl> References: <iquv48$5os$1@inews.gazeta.pl> <2050d62b-b06c-4658-a2b4-b9361e1cf188@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <ir5ip0$p5p$1@inews.gazeta.pl> <ir6m6m$e01$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <ir6rba$pvl$1@opal.futuro.pl> <ir6sna$ug5$1@news.onet.pl> <ir7r47$hvf$2@opal.futuro.pl> <ir7ui1$emf$2@news.onet.pl> <ir7vkk$vur$1@opal.futuro.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-78-1-13.dynamic.chello.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1305969812 15055 89.78.1.13 (21 May 2011 09:23:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: niusy@onet.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 09:23:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.134 (Wait for Me; GIT cb32159 master) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit