🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:07:04 +0100, darekm <darekm@emadar.com> wrote:

>On 2013-12-28 04:10, A.L. wrote:
>
>>
>> Bardzo nieczestor to robie, ale tyym razem zrobie. Polecam Wikipedie
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_pattern
>>
>> g\tam pozrednei zaimplemenorano wzorzec Command
>>
>
>Jeżeli poprawnie Cię rozumiem to identyfikatory klas winny być 
>rzeczownikami a nie czasownikami , czyli  FlipUpCommand a nie samo 
>FlipUp, analogicznie KomendaZrobCosTam vs ZrobCosTam.
>
>I to *zawsze* ma być czytelniej, bardziej jednoznacznie? A może ma inną 
>wartość?

P.S. Podepre sie cytatem

Class and Interface Names

Class names are always nouns, not verbs. Avoid making a noun out of a
verb, example DividerClass. If you are having difficulty naming a
class then perhaps it is a bad class. 

Interface names should always be an adjective (wherever possible)
describing the enforced behaviors of the class (noun). Preferably,
said adjective should end in "able" following an emerging preference
in Java. i.e. Clonable, Versionable, Taggable, etc.
...
Class names should be descriptive in nature without implying
implementation. The internal implementation of an object should be
encapsulated and not visible outside the object. Since implementation
can change, to imply implementation in the name forces the class name
and all references to it to change or else the code can become
misleading.

http://www.iwombat.com/standards/JavaStyleGuide.html#Class%20and%20Interface%20Names

A.L.