🚀 go-pugleaf

"Michal Przybylek" <pkmichal@poczta.onet.pl> writes:

> Erlang nie mial byc "funkcyjny".

Mylisz się, od początku miał mieć taki charakter jak ma. Prawda, że
lambdy dodano stosunkowo niedawno, ale to drobiazg.

http://www.erlang.org/course/history.html

"1982 - 1985
Experiments with programming of telecom using > 20 different
languages. Conclusion: The language must be a very high level symbolic
language in order to achive productivity gains ! (Leaves us with:
Lisp, Prolog, Parlog ...)

1985 - 86
Experiments with Lisp,Prolog, Parlog etc. Conclusion: The language
must contain primitives for concurrency and error recovery, and the
execution model must not have back-tracking. (Rules out Lisp and
Prolog.) It must also have a granularity of concurrency such that one
asyncronous telephony process is represented by one process in the
language. (Rules out Parlog.) We must therefore develop our own
language with the desirable features of Lisp, Prolog and Parlog, but
with concurrency and error recovery built into the language.

1987
The first experiments with Erlang."

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/