Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
11 messages
11 total messages
Started by j... James Durkin
Wed, 13 May 1992 19:42
Links
Author: j... James Durkin
Date: Wed, 13 May 1992 19:42
Date: Wed, 13 May 1992 19:42
29 lines
2112 bytes
2112 bytes
Since I've yet to see a substantive post, I'll go ahead and try to be the first. Even though I've never played a round of golf in my life I went ahead and purchased Links. So far (2+ months since purchase) I've thoroughly enjoyed the game. Even goofing around on the practice tee is fun. If I had a little more money budgeted for it I'd probably buy a couple of more course disks (I took the registration offer and purchased Bountiful for $9.95). Anyway, to the point. There is one (apparent) feature to the the game that I don't like. It seems to add a "momentum" factor to players under certain circumstances. After making a good putt for a birdie, I notice that that particular player seems much more likely to sink long putts, chip in from the rough, etc.. This could be a completely subjective impression on my part (one presses and does dumb things when behind, but plays intelligently and under control when things are "going well"), but I kind of doubt it. Having one out of three or four players in a round consistently sink 30-60 foot putts is a bit much. The "phenomena" seems to end after 4-6 holes or so. Has anyone else noticed this, or is it just me? In general, is the concept of "momentum" thought of as an appropriate feature by game designers? While on the subject of Links, does anyone have good info on the 386 version? I saw the add and upgrade offer in the current issue of Computer Gaming World. Since the offer expires in August, I would assume the game would be out before then. Given the track record of game publishers though I probably should ask whether that's this year or next. :.: James Durkin (j...@cs.brown.edu)
Re: Links
Author: van... Eddie Munster
Date: Wed, 13 May 1992 23:07
Date: Wed, 13 May 1992 23:07
30 lines
2233 bytes
2233 bytes
In article <1992May13....@cs.brown.edu> j...@cs.brown.edu (James Durkin) writes: > >Anyway, to the point. There is one (apparent) feature to the the game that I >don't like. It seems to add a "momentum" factor to players under certain >circumstances. After making a good putt for a birdie, I notice that that >particular player seems much more likely to sink long putts, chip in from the >rough, etc.. This could be a completely subjective impression on my part I've been playing Links for quite some time now and I have never noticed this "momentum" factor. I think that the peson making these long putts simply got the hang of it a bit more than others. Links *looks* great, but it has some flaws... I wish they had computer players that you could play against. Also, I don't like the fact that you can take mulligans any time you want. There should be a way to turn off that feature where it can't be turned back on. For all you golf game fans out there, there's a fairly new golf game called Jack Nicklaus Golf - Signature Edition. I've tried this game out and if you've played the previous version of Nicklaus Golf, this one is a BIG improvement. It still isn't as pretty as Links, but it has some great options like playing against the computer (who's skill you can modify). You can pick from several body types to represent yourself (male, female, tall, short...). You can play different games or a tournament and mulligans are a little more realistic, you only get one per game and it can only be used on a tee shot. If you have a sound card, there's some great audience sounds if you make a good shot or come close. --Traig
Re: Links
Author: pres... Pat Presidente
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 01:42
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 01:42
11 lines
1052 bytes
1052 bytes
After getting Windows 3.0, I tried running Links from inside Windows and got the message to exit completely from Windows before running it. After installing Windows 3.1, I tred again - this time it started up nicely. Unfortunately, as I proceeded into the game the screen redraw was unbearably slow. Has anyone been able to set up a PIF that gets Links running well in Win 3.1? I use a 386Sx notebook with 6megs Ram. Any help would be appreciated. Pat Presidente
Re: Links
Author: van... Eddie Munster
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 03:06
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 03:06
18 lines
1412 bytes
1412 bytes
In article <presiden....@sfu.ca> pres...@fraser.sfu.ca (Pat Presidente) writes: >After getting Windows 3.0, I tried running Links from inside Windows >and got the message to exit completely from Windows before running it. >After installing Windows 3.1, I tred again - this time it started up >nicely. Unfortunately, as I proceeded into the game the screen redraw >was unbearably slow. > >Has anyone been able to set up a PIF that gets Links running well in >Win 3.1? I use a 386Sx notebook with 6megs Ram. > >Any help would be appreciated. >Pat Presidente I heard that there is a beta release of a Links game for Windows out there. All I know about it is you can have more than one view at the same time by opening separate windows. --Traig
Re: Links
Author: whit... Scott E. Whitsitt
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 11:13
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 11:13
44 lines
2702 bytes
2702 bytes
In article <1992May13.2...@talon.ucs.orst.edu> van...@kepler.ME.ORST.EDU (Eddie Munster) writes: >In article <1992May13....@cs.brown.edu> j...@cs.brown.edu (James Durkin) writes: >> >>Anyway, to the point. There is one (apparent) feature to the the game that I >>don't like. It seems to add a "momentum" factor to players under certain >>circumstances. After making a good putt for a birdie, I notice that that >>particular player seems much more likely to sink long putts, chip in from the >>rough, etc.. This could be a completely subjective impression on my part > >I've been playing Links for quite some time now and I have never >noticed this "momentum" factor. I think that the peson making >these long putts simply got the hang of it a bit more than others. > >Links *looks* great, but it has some flaws... I wish they had >computer players that you could play against. Also, I don't like >the fact that you can take mulligans any time you want. There should >be a way to turn off that feature where it can't be turned back on. You can turn mulligans of for the duration of a round by clicking the right mouse button while the arrow is in the viewing area, before you select continue. This will turn the mulligan box red. > >For all you golf game fans out there, there's a fairly new golf >game called Jack Nicklaus Golf - Signature Edition. I've tried >this game out and if you've played the previous version of Nicklaus >Golf, this one is a BIG improvement. It still isn't as pretty as >Links, but it has some great options like playing against the computer >(who's skill you can modify). You can pick from several body types >to represent yourself (male, female, tall, short...). You can play >different games or a tournament and mulligans are a little more >realistic, you only get one per game and it can only be used on a >tee shot. If you have a sound card, there's some great audience >sounds if you make a good shot or come close. > >--Traig > -- **************************** Scott Whitsitt (708) 632-4433 whit...@void.rtsg.mot.com
Re: Links
Author: sam...
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 12:41
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 12:41
20 lines
1888 bytes
1888 bytes
In article <1992May14.0...@talon.ucs.orst.edu>, van...@kepler.ME.ORST.EDU (Eddie Munster) writes... >In article <presiden....@sfu.ca> pres...@fraser.sfu.ca (Pat Presidente) writes: >>After getting Windows 3.0, I tried running Links from inside Windows >>and got the message to exit completely from Windows before running it. >>After installing Windows 3.1, I tred again - this time it started up >>nicely. Unfortunately, as I proceeded into the game the screen redraw >>was unbearably slow. This is an acknowledged timing problem with certain non-windows apps (it's covered in one of the win3.1 readme files). The fix involves a change to system(win?).ini which I can't remember off the top of my head. The problem is that this change can mess up background file xfers... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Steven A. McCluney |"Strange women lying in ponds | | sam...@zeus.tamu.edu | distributing swords is no basis | | I'm a grad student, so my opinions | for a system of government!" | | are worthless anyway | Dennis, to King Arthur | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Links
Author: e... Eric Kimmel
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 13:30
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 13:30
44 lines
2941 bytes
2941 bytes
In <1992May13....@cs.brown.edu> j...@cs.brown.edu (James Durkin) writes: >Since I've yet to see a substantive post, I'll go ahead and try to be the >first. >Even though I've never played a round of golf in my life I went ahead and >purchased Links. So far (2+ months since purchase) I've thoroughly enjoyed >the game. Even goofing around on the practice tee is fun. If I had a little >more money budgeted for it I'd probably buy a couple of more course disks (I >took the registration offer and purchased Bountiful for $9.95). Bountiful is one of the better courses. I also have Firestone, Bay Hill, and Pinehurst. Pinehurst is the only one that really doesn't offer much in the way of scenery. Good course, though. >Anyway, to the point. There is one (apparent) feature to the the game that I >don't like. It seems to add a "momentum" factor to players under certain >circumstances. After making a good putt for a birdie, I notice that that >particular player seems much more likely to sink long putts, chip in from the >rough, etc.. This could be a completely subjective impression on my part >(one presses and does dumb things when behind, but plays intelligently and >under control when things are "going well"), but I kind of doubt it. Having >one out of three or four players in a round consistently sink 30-60 foot >putts is a bit much. The "phenomena" seems to end after 4-6 holes or so. >Has anyone else noticed this, or is it just me? In general, is the concept >of "momentum" thought of as an appropriate feature by game designers? I doubt it. They would have nothing to gain by adding such a "feature". Usually when things are going wrong for me they get worse because I start getting frustrated. >While on the subject of Links, does anyone have good info on the 386 version? >I saw the add and upgrade offer in the current issue of Computer Gaming >World. Since the offer expires in August, I would assume the game would be >out before then. Given the track record of game publishers though I probably >should ask whether that's this year or next. A while back I heard of something called Links Gold that was supposed to be out this year. Maybe this is what you're talking about. >:.: James Durkin (j...@cs.brown.edu) ewk
Re: Links 386 Pro (was Links)
Author: ro... Ross Erickson
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 16:15
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 16:15
22 lines
1814 bytes
1814 bytes
> >>While on the subject of Links, does anyone have good info on the 386 version? >>I saw the add and upgrade offer in the current issue of Computer Gaming >>World. Since the offer expires in August, I would assume the game would be >>out before then. Given the track record of game publishers though I probably >>should ask whether that's this year or next. > >A while back I heard of something called Links Gold that was supposed to be >out this year. Maybe this is what you're talking about. If you get the first issue of Game Bytes, there is a full preview of the Links 386 Pro in it. On most FTP sites. Certainly on WUARCHIVE. > -- |-------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | Ross Erickson | Alice: Which road do I take? | | ro...@kaos.b23b.ingr.com | Cheshire Cat: Where are you going? | | 205-730-8907 - voice | Alice: I don't know. | | 205-730-6445 - fax | Cheshire Cat: Then any road will do. | | | |-------------------------------------------------------------------|
Re: Links
Author: gun... Gunjan Bhow
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 19:55
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 19:55
28 lines
1842 bytes
1842 bytes
In article <presiden....@sfu.ca> pres...@fraser.sfu.ca (Pat Presidente) writes: >After getting Windows 3.0, I tried running Links from inside Windows >and got the message to exit completely from Windows before running it. >After installing Windows 3.1, I tred again - this time it started up >nicely. Unfortunately, as I proceeded into the game the screen redraw >was unbearably slow. > >Has anyone been able to set up a PIF that gets Links running well in >Win 3.1? I use a 386Sx notebook with 6megs Ram. > >Any help would be appreciated. >Pat Presidente > If you run any graphics intensive applications in Windows (3.0 or 3.1), the screen redraw or the animation will be very slow. The reason behind this is the fact that Windows takes control of all devices (display, disks, ports) and does not relinquish it till you exit it. On the other hand, most games RELY on direct access to display memory to create fast animation. In your case, evrytime Links issues a screen redraw, Windows traps that call and performs its own redraw while doing a lot of other overhead and making everything slow. Anyway, the point is not to run any graphics-intensive games from Windows unless you are ready for a major performance slowdown. Hope this helps. Gunjan
Re: Links
Author: pres... Pat Presidente
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 23:17
Date: Thu, 14 May 1992 23:17
4 lines
745 bytes
745 bytes
Thanks for the explanations on the Windows slowdown of Links. Oh well, running bare Dos periodically won't kill me. Pat Presidente
Re: Links
Author: ba...
Date: Fri, 15 May 1992 18:49
Date: Fri, 15 May 1992 18:49
28 lines
2181 bytes
2181 bytes
In article <1992May13.2...@talon.ucs.orst.edu>, van...@kepler.ME.ORST.EDU (Eddie Munster) writes: > In article <1992May13....@cs.brown.edu> j...@cs.brown.edu (James Durkin) writes: >> >>Anyway, to the point. There is one (apparent) feature to the the game that I >>don't like. It seems to add a "momentum" factor to players under certain >>circumstances. After making a good putt for a birdie, I notice that that >>particular player seems much more likely to sink long putts, chip in from the >>rough, etc.. This could be a completely subjective impression on my part > > I've been playing Links for quite some time now and I have never > noticed this "momentum" factor. I think that the peson making > these long putts simply got the hang of it a bit more than others. > > Links *looks* great, but it has some flaws... I wish they had > computer players that you could play against. Also, I don't like > the fact that you can take mulligans any time you want. There should > be a way to turn off that feature where it can't be turned back on. I just saw a ad for Links 386 pro in full color super VGA graphics (600 X 480 - or somthing like that) the pictures looked increadble!! It has a record feature that records your entire game and then you can give this to a friend who then can play against your game shot for shot. It even comes with some prerecorded games so it is essentially like playing against a computer. It also allows for multiple windows giving different views to be open at once. All in all looks like a incredible game. Makes me glad I have a 386! Kevin
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads