🚀 go-pugleaf

> Phillip Jordan wrote:
> 


> > His "arguments" such as " if you're not satisfied, stop playing,
> > shut up and go away"  turned me mad.
> >
> > My most sincere apologizes to all I could have offended.
> 
> Good.
> 

> > That doesn't change any of my arguments against TTo and TTd and
> > suggestions to improve it (patch for blocking as many as possible
> > CHEAT and TRICK possibilities) ).
> 
> Well, it can't change much as I didn't find any real arguments anyway.


> Something along the lines of "OK, this is bad in this and this way, we
> could improve the situation/make upcoming titles better by <insert
> ideas here>"


Hi.

Listing of the bugs is actually being done : simply collect two or three
of the last posts and you have about 10 to 12 big bugs that should be
corrected.

Constructive criticism ?
Ok. Just ONE suggestion : in order to prevent people to throw rails all
over in order to block progression of the opponent, there could be a
rule like this :

--- When a player has put three (or just TWO...) pieces of roads or
rails that are just NOT connected to anything, then there would be a
message popping up that would say "You are setting rails in a
"non-constructive" way. Your penalty is : you are not allowed to build
anything during the next six months".


Same for stations that are connected to nowhere and are just set up in
order to steal goods of the opponent.



Those bugs (the 10 or 12 ones) are not very difficult to correct.



 
> Also, it seems you have either suddenly realised that, you still
> haven't replied to my post. The second possible reason for this is
> that you can't stand real arguments agains yours and thus are too
> afraid to continue to contribute.
> *muahaha*
> 
> Phillip


No. The only reason is that I have a lot to do besides discussing about
that matter...


Have a nice day,

Philippe BRUNO.