🚀 go-pugleaf

Philippe BRUNO schrieb:

> > Phillip Jordan wrote:
> >
>
> > > His "arguments" such as " if you're not satisfied, stop playing,
> > > shut up and go away"  turned me mad.
> > >
> > > My most sincere apologizes to all I could have offended.
> >
> > Good.
> >
>
> > > That doesn't change any of my arguments against TTo and TTd and
> > > suggestions to improve it (patch for blocking as many as possible
> > > CHEAT and TRICK possibilities) ).
> >
> > Well, it can't change much as I didn't find any real arguments anyway.
>
> > Something along the lines of "OK, this is bad in this and this way, we
> > could improve the situation/make upcoming titles better by <insert
> > ideas here>"
>
> Hi.
>
> Listing of the bugs is actually being done : simply collect two or three
> of the last posts and you have about 10 to 12 big bugs that should be
> corrected.
>
> Constructive criticism ?
> Ok. Just ONE suggestion : in order to prevent people to throw rails all
> over in order to block progression of the opponent, there could be a
> rule like this :
>
> --- When a player has put three (or just TWO...) pieces of roads or
> rails that are just NOT connected to anything, then there would be a
> message popping up that would say "You are setting rails in a
> "non-constructive" way. Your penalty is : you are not allowed to build
> anything during the next six months".
>
> Same for stations that are connected to nowhere and are just set up in
> order to steal goods of the opponent.
>
> Those bugs (the 10 or 12 ones) are not very difficult to correct.
>
>
> > Also, it seems you have either suddenly realised that, you still
> > haven't replied to my post. The second possible reason for this is
> > that you can't stand real arguments agains yours and thus are too
> > afraid to continue to contribute.
> > *muahaha*
> >
> > Phillip
>
> No. The only reason is that I have a lot to do besides discussing about
> that matter...
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Philippe BRUNO.