Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
Article #66714Re: VHS versus Betamax (was: Let's unite to destroy Microsoft!)
From: Stuart Painting
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 00:00
47 lines
3033 bytes
3033 bytes
In article <5dalhn$q...@tor-nn1-hb0.netcom.ca>, John Savard <URL:mailto:sew...@netcom.ca> wrote: > > Iain Wilkie Logan <iain...@enterprise.net> wrote: > > >Or VHS versus Betamax - a case of a > >poorer technology becoming predominant, which is relatively unusual. Perhaps > >it was a victory by 'marketing' over 'product worth'. > > Actually, no. > > VHS was poorer than Betamax in some respects, but better in others > that were more valued by more consumers. > > Beta mode L-500 time L-750 time Equivalent VHS mode T-120 time > > Beta I 1 hr 1 hr 30 min Standard Play 2 hrs > Beta II 2 hrs 3 hrs Long Play 4 hrs > Beta III 3 hrs 4 hrs 30 min Extended Play (EP/SLP) 6 hrs European readers of this might be a bit mystified because on this side of the pond, Beta machines only had _one_ speed: an L-750 tape played for 3 hours 15 minutes. The equivalent VHS tape (E-180) played for 3 hours exactly. Hence you got more on a Beta tape than you did on VHS. And the picture quality was better (or it seemed that way to me when I did an A-B comparison back in 1979). The reason for VHS succeeding in the UK had absolutely nothing to do with the relative technical merits of the formats: put simply, JVC did an exclusive deal with Thorn EMI (who ran the Radio Rentals, DER and Multibroadcast chains of TV rental stores). Hence on day one, JVC had 90% of the rental market sewn up. Few people could afford the 750 UKP needed to buy a video recorder, but a lot could afford 25 UKP per month to rent one. When they went looking for a machine to rent, they would have had to hunt high and low to find a Beta machine, but VHS was available from 3 different high street stores (part of the same chain, but they weren't to know that). So they made the obvious choice. The large number of rented video recorders had a knock-on effect on the sale/hire of prerecorded tapes, with inevitable results. So there you have it. A triumph of marketing, certainly. stuart -- Stuart Painting (stu...@zedtoo.demon.co.uk)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ant0601540b0MRUA@zedtoo.demon.co.uk>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32DB2690.3533@geocities.com> <ant170032d07Whac@binliner.demon.co.uk> <32E43004.3CE1@chevalier.net> <ant232236b496Quo@cartmell.demon.co.uk> <01bc0b59$a92fac80$38ae37cf@computer-name> <ant292121bc8krWe@iainlogan.enterprise.net> <5dalhn$q9n@tor-nn1-hb0.netcom.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Stuart Painting <stu...@zedtoo.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: VHS versus Betamax (was: Let's unite to destroy Microsoft!) Date: 1997/02/06 Message-ID: <ant0601540b0MRUA@zedtoo.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 214899683 x-nntp-posting-host: zedtoo.demon.co.uk references: <32DB2690.3533@geocities.com> <ant170032d07Whac@binliner.demon.co.uk> <32E43004.3CE1@chevalier.net> <ant232236b496Quo@cartmell.demon.co.uk> <01bc0b59$a92fac80$38ae37cf@computer-name> <ant292121bc8krWe@iainlogan.enterprise.net> <5dalhn$q9n@tor-nn1-hb0.netcom.ca> organization: (not applicable) mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.acorn.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt,comp.os.linux.network,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games,comp.security.misc,rec.aviation.simulators,comp.sys.palmtops,alt.2600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit