🚀 go-pugleaf

   -> Wow.  You seem to know a lot about this porno stuff... aren't you ashamed
   -> that some kid might see your language in otherwise a healthy newsgroup?

I do?!? The extent of my "knowledge" is the half-hour of a vampire movie
I saw in my freshman year at college -- I assume they all have the basic
format, right? Or has there been an innovation?

(And by the way -- you admit the title alone is offensive -- Game
Over. You Lose.)

   -> Actually, if you can only describe sex as you have so graphically
   -> yeah, I guess you can make an argument that sex can be, ah, "carnal".

The point is, that's the way sex =is= in these products -- and that it
does NOT reflect the real world -- and, therefore, is NOT what some of
the proponents pretend it is, i.e., a healthy view of bodies, the wonder
of sex and true love, etc.

But you missed the irony. Not surprising, considering your next
paragraph:

   -> But look at it this way.  Abovementioned description is not
   -> how sex should be thought of.  Instead, it's the one of the greatest
   -> physical gifts that God has bestowed upon us.  If you only see it as
   -> filthy and ugly, then, too, are you.  After all, buddy, how did YOU
   -> come to being, hm?  And may I be so bold as to suggest you cut down
   -> on your porno watching activities?  Too much of that stuff seems to
   -> warp one's mind, as demonstrated...  'course, little porno now and
   -> then can't hurt much either...

<ad hominem>

<stupid, too>