🚀 go-pugleaf

I would like to modify you signature because I find it 
offensive.

So you have hit no a key point as to why the Power PC is dead 
in the water for the time being, there is no damm mainstream OS 
and apps for it.  Damm emulation doesn't cut it, as you point 
out for NT.  

I have a question for you - do you know if the Cairo beta 
support the standard WIN32 and WIN32c or is it a another 
modified type?

bye

/USER





eh...@mirac.unm.edu (Dan Ehrig) wrote:
>Kevin Speichts (kspe...@fox.nstn.ns.ca) wrote:
>
>: Hah! hah, hah!.   What a joke, OS/2 runs doom in a DOS box with 4Mb of RAM, 
>
>OS/2 doesnt run will in 4 megs.  NT doesnt run at all in 4 megs.  Or 8.  
>
>: right!!!!    OS/2 needs as much hardware behind it as NT any day.   NT, with 
>: '95's shell, it's out in beta, will kick OS/2's butt.   Period.
>
>Only if (a big if) MS upgrades NT's lousy Dos emulation (for the record, 
>NT cannot run Dos Doom as it is, though it supposedly can run win32 Doom, 
>although it has not been released yet.  Pitiful really, it still being 
>unreleased over a year after the original was released, and after it has 
>lost its appeal to most [the same goes for the OS/2 version])
>
>: Yeah, and the world will end tomorrow!   Explain why OS/2 isn't shipping with 
>: the PowerPC and NT is.    Hah, hah, thanks I needed a good laugh.   ;) 
>
>Hah, hah.  Because OS/2 for the PowerPC is not finished yet.  Because the 
>original was not microkernel based, requiring a larger amount of work in 
>the port.
>
>
>: ----------------------------------------------------
>: Kevin Speichts
>: Beaverbank Nova Scotia
>
>And it really is rude to modify someone's signature.
>
>(that having been said, you will no doubt alter mine as well)
>
>-Dan
>
>--
>My inner child is a mean little fucker.
>http://www.unm.edu/~dehrig/dan3.html