🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:35:58 -0800, bp <6ball@comcast.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:33:27 +0000, br d <one1@two2.fsnet.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:21:00 -0800, bp <6ball@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:57:41 GMT, "FLY135" <fly_135(@ hot not
>>>not)notmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"bp" <6ball@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:a2pd20p1gr6sekb84qc3rgmjmu4qckt0tj@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:25:19 GMT, "FLY135" <fly_135@(hot not
>>>>> not)notmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >I will still attempt to put some time into this game to see if I can find
>>>>> >any redeeming features.  Just maybe somewhere in there is some fun
>>>>gameplay.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> How is UC different form the other BC games?
>>>>
>>>>So far it looks the same.  The main screen lacks the tutorial button, which
>>>>IMO is a step in the wrong direction.  You would think that after publishing
>>>>a game with a button to access tutorials that didn't tutor anything, that
>>>>the next game woud actually add tutorials that did tutor.
>>>>
>>>>I have no idea what changes were made from BCG to UC to "rebrand and action
>>>>focus" the game.  Best I can tell is it's just a name change and an
>>>>incremental update over BCM plus a long overdue printed manual.
>>>>
>>>Hey br d sounds like you owe me some kudos.
>>
>>You don't get it that easy, I said if somebody says it's crap, he
>>hasn't said that (yet).
>>Anyway, that's FLY135, I have him palmfiled, which means I have to put
>>my hand over the parts of the post he wrote.
>
>I believe you got on me for suggesting the game would be buggy. 
>
> http://www.3000ad.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=forum;f=21
>
>Maybe this will help convince you.
>
>BTW buggy CTD games are crap.
>
>I'll be waiting.

This is where I referred to UC:
----------------------------
You've been pulling people up about UC and saying "How can you know
this", so lets question the questioner, how can you have these
opinions about the game when you've never played it?
You want to tell people it's full of bugs, or in your experience it
doesn't run or patch then great, go ahead you're talking from first
hand knowledge, but someone came here for some genuine information
about the game and you say all of the above. 
-------------------------------

You'll notice I said that if you wanted to tell people it was full of
bugs then fine, hardly "getting at you", the rest of the post I was
referring to BCM, and more pointedly, to the fact that you readily
offer critical opinions on something you haven't had any experience
of. How the game we still don't know, if it's buggy as fuck then
great, you made the right call, although I never said I expected it
not to be, I said BCM was now "mostly stable".

Isn't this fun? It's like watching Ribo and Dan pick over every
utterance all over again.

Christmas is coming.

br d


>
>
>
>>
>>br d