🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:18:13 +0000, br d <one1@two2.fsnet.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:35:58 -0800, bp <6ball@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:33:27 +0000, br d <one1@two2.fsnet.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:21:00 -0800, bp <6ball@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:57:41 GMT, "FLY135" <fly_135(@ hot not
>>>>not)notmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"bp" <6ball@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:a2pd20p1gr6sekb84qc3rgmjmu4qckt0tj@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 23:25:19 GMT, "FLY135" <fly_135@(hot not
>>>>>> not)notmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >I will still attempt to put some time into this game to see if I can find
>>>>>> >any redeeming features.  Just maybe somewhere in there is some fun
>>>>>gameplay.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How is UC different form the other BC games?
>>>>>
>>>>>So far it looks the same.  The main screen lacks the tutorial button, which
>>>>>IMO is a step in the wrong direction.  You would think that after publishing
>>>>>a game with a button to access tutorials that didn't tutor anything, that
>>>>>the next game woud actually add tutorials that did tutor.
>>>>>
>>>>>I have no idea what changes were made from BCG to UC to "rebrand and action
>>>>>focus" the game.  Best I can tell is it's just a name change and an
>>>>>incremental update over BCM plus a long overdue printed manual.
>>>>>
>>>>Hey br d sounds like you owe me some kudos.
>>>
>>>You don't get it that easy, I said if somebody says it's crap, he
>>>hasn't said that (yet).
>>>Anyway, that's FLY135, I have him palmfiled, which means I have to put
>>>my hand over the parts of the post he wrote.
>>
>>I believe you got on me for suggesting the game would be buggy. 
>>
>> http://www.3000ad.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=forum;f=21
>>
>>Maybe this will help convince you.
>>
>>BTW buggy CTD games are crap.
>>
>>I'll be waiting.
>
>This is where I referred to UC:
>----------------------------
>You've been pulling people up about UC and saying "How can you know
>this", so lets question the questioner, how can you have these
>opinions about the game when you've never played it?
>You want to tell people it's full of bugs, or in your experience it
>doesn't run or patch then great, go ahead you're talking from first
>hand knowledge, but someone came here for some genuine information
>about the game and you say all of the above. 
>-------------------------------
>
>You'll notice I said that if you wanted to tell people it was full of
>bugs then fine, hardly "getting at you", the rest of the post I was
>referring to BCM, and more pointedly, to the fact that you readily
>offer critical opinions on something you haven't had any experience
>of. How the game we still don't know, if it's buggy as fuck then
>great, you made the right call, although I never said I expected it
>not to be, I said BCM was now "mostly stable".


NO NO NO NO

YOu said 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look, i'm happy to be friendly, or i'm happy to fall out, I don't
care, my intention with this is not to slag you off and start a row
but just to highlight the absurdity of it. If someone fancies trying
the game then they can find out for themselves, if they come back here
and say "You were spot on bp, it's a load of old horse shit" I'll
laugh and give you a bit of kudos, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But I see you are correct no one as actually come here and said it's a
load of old horse shit yet.

I'll wait a little longer.



>>
>>
>>>
>>>br d