🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 07:03:03 GMT, Shingen
<Shingen@aolsukd.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 06:28:14 GMT, "Bill Huffman"
><bhuffma1@REMOVE-THISsan.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>I respect your and Br d's opinion of the game. It just sounds horribly boring to
>>me and the time that I played the free version for a couple hours (okay most of
>>that time was trying to get the damn thing installed) it was far more like work
>>than fun. Being a software engineer, reading technical manuals and struggling
>>with bugs is gosh darn work, not my idea of hobby fun! As you said,
>>
>>Opinion may and will vary. =P
>>
>well if it was a crap release of the same game, I would be the first
>to scream about it. The fact is there is DEFINITE "production value"
>in this release. It may not be on par with M$, but it's still far
>superior to any Activision game I've ever bought.
>
>Gameplay is entirely subject to the gamer, but the title is NOT a
>"value product" even though DC chose to market it as such. 
>
>It's a good buy for the price even if it's exactly the same as BCM
>with improved graphics. 
>
>Maybe you should expand your horizons and purchase it just so you can
>say you played the game and it was indeed crap. 
>
>...or maybe, if you opened your mind and closed your prejudices, you
>might find a game worth merit after all...=P

The game isn't the point