🚀 go-pugleaf

Insane Ranter <log...@gmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of
the porn spammer to utter  "The Augury is good, the signs say:

>On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 9:05:59 AM UTC-5, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:04:23 -0800 (PST), seans...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> >On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 at 7:02:40 PM UTC-5, Alanrco wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> >SO, your on your own when it comes to horses in Elder Scrolls v.
>> 
>> You know you responded to a three-year old post, right?
>> 
>
>This was common practice in usenet. You never made a new thread just continued older threads. Added knowledge to the thread going. 

Nonsense!

It's common practice of idiots using google groups and exploring usenet
for the first time who can't be bothered actually looking at the date of
the post before they reply.   Pretty much no one else does it.

The design of google groups doesn't help either, especially on
widescreen monitors, with the post all the way over on the left side of
the screen and the date all the way over on the right with nothing to
call attention to it.

Actual newsreaders make the date of posts FAR more obvious so people
don't reply to decade old posts.

Google seems designed to be as un-user friendly as possible, with every
redesign making things worse.

Xocyll
-- 

I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of 
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably, 
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So 
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr