Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg
Article #709882Re: MechWarrior: the first details
From: Wolfing
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:30
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:30
25 lines
2394 bytes
2394 bytes
On Jul 9, 12:59 pm, Memnoch
<mem...@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:29:28 -0700 (PDT), Wolfing <wolf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 9, 7:15 am, "Jonah Falcon" <jonah...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >>http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/100/1002295p1.html
>
> >> *
>
> >>http://pc.ign.com/articles/100/1002164p1.html
>
> >Thanks for the info (even though OOT). I loved MW since the very first
> >one, but I fear the consolization of this even though they say it
> >won't affect the game.
>
> I'm pretty sure that it will. But I'm wondering what they could screw up to be
> honest. It's a very arcadey type of simulation to begin with anyway. Maybe the
> customisation part of the game will suffer. I enjoyed spending time tinkering
> with the amount of armour to sacrifice for that big Ultra AC20 etc. Yep, I'm
> pretty sure that part is going to suffer. Perhaps the environment size will be
> restricted?
like, self-repair ("going to the repair station and powering down is
not fun!"), ammo ("limited ammo is not fun!"), map size ("running 1
minute to get to the action is not fun!"), reduced heating ("powering
down after firing my 6 long lasers is not fun!"), etc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<68f48585-30c4-4499-a0fb-522c43cebb54@r15g2000pra.googlegroups.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r15g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<e_-dnSe5Wur_TMjXnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <929bc823-1550-42e9-8e3a-9d1ba58f7feb@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <l98c55prgncmtcutp99us5bctqkk7gc3k4@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r15g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Wolfing <wolf...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg Subject: Re: MechWarrior: the first details Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 31 Message-ID: <68f48585-30c4-4499-a0fb-522c43cebb54@r15g2000pra.googlegroups.com> References: <e_-dnSe5Wur_TMjXnZ2dnUVZ_tKdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <929bc823-1550-42e9-8e3a-9d1ba58f7feb@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <l98c55prgncmtcutp99us5bctqkk7gc3k4@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.135.46.35 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247160641 30926 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2009 17:30:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: r15g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.135.46.35; posting-account=fnHcFQoAAACbMS49XZdz_ieqkV1VPtnw User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit