🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3bl8i9$2...@homer.alpha.net> jay...@earth.execpc.com (Jim Vieira) writes:
>Alistair Brown (A.D....@bradford.ac.uk) wrote:
>
>: The Hermit <s010...@cc.ysu.edu> writes:
>: >The real question is, why does the Guardian want the avatar left alive?
>: >There must be some reason why, when he has the avatar in the palm of his
>: >hand, he doesn't just squeeze.
>
>: Perhaps because that would be no fun at all?  Wouldn't the guardian really
>: enjoy putting the avatar in a position where they think they're able to
>: defeat the guardian... before bringing on his mother?
>
>I agree.  It seemed to me that the Guardian didn't want to kill the 
>Avatar, he just wanted to dump him off somewhere while he destroyed 
>Britannia.  I also think the Guardian knew that the Avatar would achieve
>ultimate power on Pagan, and WANTED him to do so.  This way the Avatar
>could return to Britannia (endgame U8) and see the destruction.  It also
>would then allow for a more evenly matched final battle in U9.  This
>is the type of logic I see in villians in stories and movies now and 
>then.  The bad guy is so confident that he is willing to risk it all just
>to gloat over his victim.  But in the end, the victim outdoes him and wins.
>
>--
>						Jim Vieira
>						jay...@earth.execpc.com
>
It's called meglomania (spelling?) absolutely everything has to be a grand
scheme (Including Killing the Avatar).

--Chris

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cjoh...@uceng.uc.edu			| My God can beat up your God
University of Cincinnati		| Campus Crusade for Cthulhu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------