Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc
Article #83049Re: Kali usenet group
From: andrew... Andrew D. Myers
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00
20 lines
1585 bytes
1585 bytes
mcar...@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Michael Carmack) wrote: >wbbe...@evansville.net wrote: >: I am in the process of setting up a new usenet group called >: alt.games.kali. It will be for discussion of IPX style gaming mostly >: about Kali but also including Ifrag and other protocols. I have >Perhaps it's too late, but why wouldn't you want to put this under a more >widely spread hierarchy? I don't see why a comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.kali >wouldn't pass. A lot of sites won't carry alt.* groups for various reasons. Better yet, why not a more general comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.networked? Or, even better, comp.networks.games. Given that games are starting to arrive that can be networked between different client platforms (eg, Macs and PCs playing the same game together on a 'net), a more all-encompassing group would seem to be more forward-thinking. --- Andrew D. Myers : (k) All Rites Reversed andrew...@pobox.com : Reprint what you like!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4lgbl5$99j@news.cs.hope.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31780d63.7497898@204.120.16.3> <4lb7b4$jm6@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: andrew...@pobox.com (Andrew D. Myers) Subject: Re: Kali usenet group Date: 1996/04/22 Message-ID: <4lgbl5$99j@news.cs.hope.edu> X-Deja-AN: 150903674 references: <31780d63.7497898@204.120.16.3> <4lb7b4$jm6@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> organization: Hope College newsgroups: alt.binaries.warcraft,alt.games,alt.games.command-n-conq,alt.games.descent,alt.games.duke3d,alt.games.warcraft,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,eol.chatline,evv.chatline MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit