Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)

Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by jma... Joseph T. Malloy Mon, 17 Jul 1995 00:00

#1038

Author: jma... Joseph T. Malloy
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 1995 00:00

28 lines
1710 bytes

In article <kremeDB...@netcom.com> kr...@netcom.com (Cerebus The Aardvark) writes:
>jco...@socketis.net (Jody Cooper) writes:
>
>>In article <3u4s8a$5...@lynx.unm.edu>,
>>   deh...@capella.unm.edu (Dan Ehrig) wrote:
>>>Jody Cooper (jco...@socketis.net) wrote:
>>>
>>>: Hmmm.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Warp was supposed to have 
>>>: support for Win32s.
>>>
>>>It did.  For Win32s 1.15.   So, after Warp's release, MS changed it so 
>>>that it was incompatible.  Accidentally of course.
>
>>Ahh.  Kind of like the Windows 3.11 "refresh" files that did nothing more but 
>>prevent people from using the then just-release OS/2 for Windows. <G!>
>
>And people continue to do business with Microsquish, it's amazing.  Here is
>a company practiving the melectronic equiv of "ethnic cleansing" and people
>continue to throw money at them.  Here's a hint: If you continue to support
>microsoft, they will continue to screw you at every opportunity.

I've "supported" Microsoft by buying their software, though hardly
exclusively, and they have yet to "screw" me.

>
>My Hard drive is Micro-soft free, is yours?

Nope.  Wouldn't have it any other way.

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads